From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0D4CB3851C1A; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 02:20:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D4CB3851C1A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592187630;
 bh=MA5apK8hYncfSM9L9uzv7gTXAe3TjAWFYfUNpuINhg0=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=gwnKSRMosvtYkGRoyG1joicoZxJBFWRhw8uPjoCHjkWFUiEaZ2JMc2nSZ6/H2XFtM
 wr7+B6GW/YYujM905PGLzgzNleRG5VNX9dvW8aquIyZKgea/5Kej8kbKc6Tj+rNEHg
 WF+lCAP9ZFRgmlWIZglFT6kzJRD1bel5A7xn4YLs=
From: "mizvekov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/64384] mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an
 aggregate is incompatible with MS ABI
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 02:20:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mizvekov at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64384-4-RxTArADhBx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64384-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64384-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 02:20:30 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64384

Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mizvekov at gmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov at gmail dot com> ---
So this is still a problem in GCC 10.1.

Per
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/x64-calling-convention?view=3Dvs=
-2019
What GCC does would be correct according to that spec. But in practice, MSVC
does different, and windows DLLs expect what MSVC does.

So I have stumbled on this problem with D3D12, calling
GetCPUDescriptorHandleForHeapStart method on ID3D12DescriptorHeap object.

Here is definition of this method from SDK:

```
virtual D3D12_CPU_DESCRIPTOR_HANDLE STDMETHODCALLTYPE=20
GetCPUDescriptorHandleForHeapStart( void) =3D 0;
```

Returned aggregate is just a boxed SIZE_T:
```
typedef struct D3D12_CPU_DESCRIPTOR_HANDLE { SIZE_T ptr; }=20=20
D3D12_CPU_DESCRIPTOR_HANDLE;
```

So it should be possible to return on register, but instead here is code fr=
om
that method (MASM syntax, taken from D3D12.dll):
```
CDescriptorHeap::GetCPUDescriptorHandleForHeapStart:
00007FF83AD6A3F0  mov         rax,qword ptr [rcx+0D0h]=20=20
00007FF83AD6A3F7  mov         qword ptr [rdx],rax
00007FF83AD6A3FA  mov         rax,rdx=20=20
00007FF83AD6A3FD  ret=20=20
```=