From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19935 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2014 23:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19880 invoked by uid 48); 30 Dec 2014 23:45:03 -0000 From: "mity at morous dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64384] mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an aggregate is incompatible with MS ABI Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 23:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mity at morous dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg02981.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384 --- Comment #4 from mity --- Daniel, COM interface should be, by definition, language agnostic. COM can be called from C++ as well as from C, and also COM object may be implemented in C++ as well as C. This implies that (at least for stdcall, as COM uses stdcall convention) there shouldn't be any difference between C and C++.