public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64432-4-IG3PC8IYks@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-64432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432

--- Comment #16 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #15)
> I was looking at this one just the other day.  There are three PRs related
> to SYSTEM_CLOCK that we should attempt to close. I will look some more
> tonight.

What's missing:

- Support for integer(1/2).  The standard requires (13.7.167):

COUNT (...). It is assigned a processor-dependent value based on the
value of the processor clock, or −HUGE (COUNT) if there is no clock.

COUNT RATE (...) It is assigned a processor-dependent approximation to
the number of processor clock counts per second, or zero if there is
no clock.

COUNT MAX (...) It is assigned the maximum value that COUNT can have,
or zero if there is no clock.

  We might treat any integer(1/2) argument as there were no corresponding
  clock.  I just don't know how to create the corresponding code to
  set the result variable appropriately.

- The compile-time warning FX mentioned in comment #12.  We could
  split this one off as an enhancement.

- A consensus what shall happen for arguments of mixed kinds.
>From gcc-bugs-return-477234-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Feb 13 22:35:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-477234-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31467 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2015 22:35:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31399 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2015 22:35:53 -0000
From: "howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/62132] [5 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/misalign-[12].c after r213807 on x86_64-apple-darwin13 with -m32
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-62132-4-2ytWChmcjJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-62132-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-62132-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01567.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132

howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu

--- Comment #22 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #18)
> Author: fxcoudert
> Date: Wed Nov 19 14:32:09 2014
> New Revision: 217779
> 
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217779&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> Fixing the mess I did with the two previous commits. Sorry!
> 
> 	PR sanitizer/62132
> 	* c-c++-common/asan/misalign-1.c: Pass -fno-omit-frame-pointer on
> 	darwin, adjust dg-output.
> 	* c-c++-common/asan/misalign-2.c: Likewise.
> 
> Modified:
>     trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/misalign-1.c
>     trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/misalign-2.c

Shouldn't this net change be backported to gcc-4_9-branch for 4.9.3? We seem to
need it there...

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg01535.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-477235-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Feb 13 22:59:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-477235-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5435 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2015 22:59:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5410 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2015 22:59:34 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/65060] New: [5 Regression] r220696 breaks bootstrap on Linux/x86-32
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc
Message-ID: <bug-65060-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01568.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide060

            Bug ID: 65060
           Summary: [5 Regression] r220696 breaks bootstrap on
                    Linux/x86-32
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                CC: law at redhat dot com

On Linux/x86-32, r220696 gave

make[6]: Leaving directory `/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-ia32corei7/bld'
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/gimple-fold.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-pre.o differs
gcc/omp-low.o differs
gcc/i386.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.o differs
gcc/cfgexpand.o differs
gcc/objc/objc-act.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-operands.o differs
gcc/sel-sched-ir.o differs
gcc/tree-into-ssa.o differs
gcc/java/expr.o differs
gcc/ree.o differs
gcc/sanopt.o differs
gcc/sese.o differs
gcc/cfgrtl.o differs
gcc/reg-stack.o differs
gcc/ira-emit.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.o differs
gcc/tree-emutls.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.o differs
gcc/c/c-parser.o differs
gcc/c/c-typeck.o differs
gcc/gimplify.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.o differs
gcc/tree-if-conv.o differs
gcc/lto-cgraph.o differs
gcc/cfgloopanal.o differs
gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.o differs
gcc/tree-outof-ssa.o differs
gcc/ipa-cp.o differs
gcc/lower-subreg.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.o differs
gcc/dojump.o differs
gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.o differs
gcc/function.o differs
gcc/ubsan.o differs
gcc/cfganal.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-live.o differs
gcc/fwprop.o differs
gcc/tree-complex.o differs
gcc/tree-vect-stmts.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.o differs
gcc/build/genautomata.o differs
gcc/build/genpreds.o differs
gcc/build/genmatch.o differs
gcc/final.o differs
gcc/ipa-utils.o differs
gcc/tree-vect-slp.o differs
gcc/rtlanal.o differs
gcc/lto/lto-partition.o differs
gcc/c-family/array-notation-common.o differs
gcc/ipa-inline.o differs
gcc/tree-loop-distribution.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.o differs
gcc/wide-int.o differs
gcc/bb-reorder.o differs
gcc/tree-object-size.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.o differs
gcc/tree-predcom.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-ter.o differs
gcc/cp/init.o differs
gcc/cp/decl.o differs
gcc/cp/pt.o differs
gcc/cp/class.o differs
gcc/cp/name-lookup.o differs
gcc/cp/error.o differs
gcc/cp/vtable-class-hierarchy.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.o differs
gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.o differs
gcc/ipa-icf.o differs
gcc/tree-inline.o differs
libcpp/macro.o differs
make[5]: *** [compare] Error 1

when configured with

--with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7 --prefix=/usr/5.0.0 --enable-clocale=gnu
--with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld i686-linux
--with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,java,lto,objc


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-13 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-29 10:44 [Bug fortran/64432] New: " anlauf at gmx dot de
2014-12-29 11:14 ` [Bug fortran/64432] " anlauf at gmx dot de
2014-12-29 11:18 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2014-12-29 11:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 11:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 14:13 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 15:04 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2014-12-29 15:23 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2014-12-30  9:48 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2014-12-30 10:05 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2015-01-04 21:47 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-01-04 21:56 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-01-04 22:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-04 22:53 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-01-09 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-09 14:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 20:49 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-02-11 21:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-13 22:31 ` anlauf at gmx dot de [this message]
2015-02-15  4:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16  3:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 12:04 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-02-16 20:04 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18  4:21 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 20:04 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-02-18 20:12 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-02-19 16:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 17:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 22:14 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-02-22 12:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-02-22 12:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-02-22 17:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 17:44 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-15 21:29 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-03-17  1:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17  1:05 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17  1:22 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 21:16 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-03-17 22:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18  1:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-20  7:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-64432-4-IG3PC8IYks@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).