From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-478107-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11497 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2015 16:55:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11424 invoked by uid 48); 22 Feb 2015 16:55:15 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64432-4-X5Y9lhGRKa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg02439.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432

--- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #28 and #29)

Thanks for checking and I have the cleanup taken care of. I am making some
adjustments to avoid ABI issues as well.

Test case will be next.