public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/64435] [5 Regression] Bootstrap failure in libsanitizer on AArch64 with Linux kernel <= 3.15
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64435-4-clYQmRKAjU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-64435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64435

--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
And the reason why at least in RHEL and Fedora asan doesn't work at all is:
cat /proc/self/maps; ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=1 ./null-deref-1.exe
00400000-00410000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 134631897                         
/usr/bin/cat
00410000-00420000 r--p 00000000 fd:00 134631897                         
/usr/bin/cat
00420000-00430000 rw-p 00010000 fd:00 134631897                         
/usr/bin/cat
142c0000-142f0000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0                                  [heap]
3ff929d0000-3ff99270000 r--p 00000000 fd:00 4086                        
/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive
3ff99270000-3ff993d0000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 203072141                   
/usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so
3ff993d0000-3ff993e0000 r--p 00150000 fd:00 203072141                   
/usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so
3ff993e0000-3ff993f0000 rw-p 00160000 fd:00 203072141                   
/usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so
3ff99410000-3ff99420000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0                            [vvar]
3ff99420000-3ff99430000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0                            [vdso]
3ff99430000-3ff99450000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 201341988                   
/usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
3ff99450000-3ff99460000 r--p 00010000 fd:00 201341988                   
/usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
3ff99460000-3ff99470000 rw-p 00020000 fd:00 201341988                   
/usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
3fff0680000-3fff06b0000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0                           
[stack]
==2862==Parsed ASAN_OPTIONS: verbosity=1
==2862==AddressSanitizer: libc interceptors initialized
|| `[0x002000000000, 0x007fffffffff]` || HighMem    ||
|| `[0x001400000000, 0x001fffffffff]` || HighShadow ||
|| `[0x001200000000, 0x0013ffffffff]` || ShadowGap  ||
|| `[0x001000000000, 0x0011ffffffff]` || LowShadow  ||
|| `[0x000000000000, 0x000fffffffff]` || LowMem     ||
MemToShadow(shadow): 0x001200000000 0x00123fffffff 0x001280000000
0x0013ffffffff
redzone=16
max_redzone=2048
quarantine_size=256M
malloc_context_size=30
SHADOW_SCALE: 3
SHADOW_GRANULARITY: 8
SHADOW_OFFSET: 1000000000
==2862==Installed the sigaction for signal 11
==2862==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../libsanitizer/asan/asan_poisoning.cc:24 "((AddrIsInMem(addr))) !=
(0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/Kconfig
reveals that aarch64 can be on Linux configured to support 39, 42 or 48 bits
virtual address space.  The current libsanitizer/asan/ and
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_asan_shadow_offset) seems to be okay only
for the 39 bits virtual address space, while Fedora/RHEL apparently use 42 bits
VA.  Wonder if aarch64 couldn't use a layout closer to what x86_64 uses for
asan, with shadow offset low 0x7fff8000, which is flexible to different sizes
of the virtual address space.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-19 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-29 15:41 [Bug sanitizer/64435] New: [5.0.0 " david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2014-12-29 18:21 ` [Bug sanitizer/64435] " david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2014-12-29 18:25 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2015-01-09 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-09 11:54 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2015-01-13 11:24 ` [Bug sanitizer/64435] [5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 21:17 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-18 12:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-18 19:07 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2015-01-18 19:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-18 19:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-18 19:51 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19  8:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 16:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 17:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-01-19 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 17:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 18:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 18:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 20:13 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-19 21:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-20  8:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-20 16:53 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-21 21:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-21 22:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-26 15:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-64435-4-clYQmRKAjU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).