From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22318 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2015 11:22:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22183 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2015 11:22:33 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64535] Emergency buffer for exception allocation too small Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03053.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64535 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah, I assumed the lack of destructor was intentional, so we can still deal with exceptions while destroying globals. Otherwise an exception could try to allocate from the pool after the destructor has run.