From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12388 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2015 09:01:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12329 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2015 09:01:02 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64535] Emergency buffer for exception allocation too small Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 09:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00557.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64535 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Created attachment 34399 [details] > patch fixing comment #4 > > This fixes the issue in comment #4 (it also decreases the emergency EH > object size). Note that raising std::bad_alloc from __cxa_allocate_exception looks like an ABI change as that function is declared throw(). Which means that shrinking the exceptional object size makes more cases non-conforming (if the testcase in comment #4 is supposed to work). Not shrinking the exceptional object size makes increasing the number of exceptional objects less of a non-brainer :/ The C++ FE declares the functions ECF_NOTHROW, so I wonder how my patch ended up fixing the testcase...