public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/64676] New: [5.0 Regression] SEGV in tree-ssa-structalias.c solve_constraint Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:24:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-64676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676 Bug ID: 64676 Summary: [5.0 Regression] SEGV in tree-ssa-structalias.c solve_constraint Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org $ cat conftest.c int main () { ; return 0; } (gdb) run -O conftest.c Starting program: /tmp/20150119/gcc/cc1 -O conftest.c main Analyzing compilation unit Performing interprocedural optimizations <*free_lang_data> <visibility> <build_ssa_passes> <chkp_passes> <opt_local_passes> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x100eb7fc in _ZL17solve_constraintsv () at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:8000 (gdb) where #0 0x100eb7fc in _ZL17solve_constraintsv () at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:8000 #1 0x100f7860 in _Z19compute_may_aliasesv () at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:14010 #2 0x103c31ac in _ZL21execute_function_todoP8functionPv (fn=0x5b5b0000, data=0x8) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:1927 #3 0x103c3f24 in _ZL15do_per_functionPFvP8functionPvES1_ ( callback=@0x30299ae4: 0x103c3108 <_ZL21execute_function_todoP8functionPv>, data=0x3005f550 <cfun>) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:1647 #4 0x103c41e4 in _ZL12execute_todoj (flags=1048640) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:2012 #5 0x103c7f38 in _Z16execute_one_passP8opt_pass (pass=0x30300c78) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:2339 #6 0x103c840c in _ZL19execute_pass_list_1P8opt_pass.constprop.71 ( pass=0x30300c78) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:2378 #7 0x103c8424 in _ZL19execute_pass_list_1P8opt_pass.constprop.71 ( pass=0x30300a98) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:2379 #8 0x103c84d4 in _Z17execute_pass_listP8functionP8opt_pass (fn=0x70008068, pass=0x30300958) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:2389 #9 0x103c62b8 in _Z24do_per_function_toporderPFvP8functionPvES1_ ( callback=@0x30299c94: 0x103c84a8 <_Z17execute_pass_listP8functionP8opt_pass>, data=0x30300958) at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/passes.c:1724 #10 0x103c8f50 in _Z21execute_ipa_pass_listP8opt_pass (pass=0x30300908)
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 19:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-01-19 19:24 dje at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-01-19 19:25 ` [Bug bootstrap/64676] " dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 20:23 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 20:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 21:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-20 8:29 ` ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-20 9:33 ` [Bug bootstrap/64676] [5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-64676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).