From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-474684-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12555 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2015 10:31:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12485 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jan 2015 10:31:25 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/64688] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-64688-4-cthkKfZ3G5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64688-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64688-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02678.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688

Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Fixed then.

Unfortunately not. The boost testsuite still shows the same issue
on the same file.

Reducing again.