[Bug target/64688] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

["ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|vmakarov at redhat dot com         |ubizjak at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3)
> will solve the PR.  So the change will solve 2 PRs (this one and 64477).
> 
> I believe it is up to x86 maintainers to do this change.

True. The proposed patch in PR 64477 also solves this PR.
>From gcc-bugs-return-474331-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 22 08:09:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-474331-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31805 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2015 08:09:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31681 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jan 2015 08:09:11 -0000
From: "bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/57748] [4.8 Regression] ICE when expanding assignment to unaligned zero-sized array
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-57748-4-zYFybhJ789@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-57748-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-57748-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02325.txt.bz2
Content-length: 581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idW748

--- Comment #61 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #60)
> FWIW I've been including backports of r202778 and r206437 (which I think are
> the two relevant fixes) in my 4.8-based GCCs on x86_64, sparc64, powerpc64,
> m68k, armv5, and armv7 for a year now, without regressions.


Well Mikael,


if you already have used/tested that patch on 4.8 for such a long time,
I would appreciate it very much if you post it on the gcc-patches mailing list.


Thanks
Bernd.