From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28395 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2015 14:40:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28344 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jan 2015 14:40:18 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64688] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02713.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64688 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 34566 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D34566&action=3Dedit reduced testcase trippels@gcc20 % g++ -c -O3 -std=3Dc++11 -march=3Dwestmere performance.ii performance.ii: In function =E2=80=98void performance_testtest_method()=E2= =80=99: performance.ii:133:1: internal compiler error: Max. number of generated rel= oad insns per insn is achieved (90) } ^ 0xb6e6e0 lra_constraints(bool) ../../gcc/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4335 0xb5b041 lra(_IO_FILE*) ../../gcc/gcc/lra.c:2292 0xb18da9 do_reload ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:5418 0xb18da9 execute ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:5589 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions. >>From gcc-bugs-return-474720-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Jan 24 14:47:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15567 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2015 14:47:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15512 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jan 2015 14:47:34 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/64771] ICE(segfault) when passing coarrays around; ICE in gfc_zero_size_array in arith.c:1637 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02714.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1431 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code CC| |fanfarillo.gcc at gmail dot com, | |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|ICE on invalid around |ICE(segfault) when passing |check_dummy_characteristics |coarrays around; ICE in |/ gfc_zero_size_array |gfc_zero_size_array in | |arith.c:1637 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Fails here the same way, and should be the same reason: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/msg00145.html - besides, the test case is shorter and valid: program cg implicit none integer reduce_recv_starts(2)[0:*] interface subroutine conj_grad (reduce_recv_starts) integer reduce_recv_starts(2)[0:*] end subroutine end interface call conj_grad (reduce_recv_starts) end subroutine conj_grad (reduce_recv_starts) implicit none integer reduce_recv_starts(2)[0:*] end ! end of routine conj_grad