From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-478393-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14023 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2015 23:42:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13998 invoked by uid 48); 24 Feb 2015 23:42:31 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/64703] glibc sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/dl-machine.h miscompile
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64703-4-steaM6cxkI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64703-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64703-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg02725.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64703

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The test case is invalid because it accesses the value of the opd object via a
pointer to a function when C allows an object to have its value accessed only
by an lvalue of a compatible type.

A simpler test case that demonstrates a similar issue is below:

#include <assert.h>

struct X { const char *s; };
struct Y { unsigned long n; };

const char* __attribute__ ((weak))
foo (unsigned long value) {
    struct Y y;

    if (value) {
        y.n = ((struct Y*)value)->n;
        value = (unsigned long)&y;
    }

    return ((struct X*)value)->s;
}

int main (void) {
    struct Y y = { 123 }; 

    unsigned long n = (unsigned long)foo ((unsigned long)&y);

    assert (n == y.n);

    return 0;
}