From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5242 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2015 16:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5201 invoked by uid 55); 22 Jan 2015 16:29:53 -0000 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/64731] vector lowering should split loads and stores Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02415.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731 > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Doesn't look like a regression, I see roughly same code quality all the way > from 4.1 which I tried first to current trunk. Yes, it's not a regression and a fix has to wait for GCC 6.