From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-475244-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25720 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2015 13:37:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25627 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jan 2015 13:37:09 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64757-4-jFqbpEK8vj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03238.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757

--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > It it certainly related, but I'm not sure it is an exact duplicate.
> > In particular the above PR has quite a history and includes several
> > test cases. Let's keep it separate for now.
> 
> I disagree. AFACT this PR gives the same ICE as the test in pr49213 comment
> 8 or the following variant of the original code
> 
> program main
> 
>   type :: S
>     integer :: n
>   end type
>   type(S) :: Sobj
> 
>   type, extends(S) :: S2
>     integer :: m
>   end type
>   type(S2) :: S2obj
> 
>   type :: T
>     class(S), allocatable :: x
>   end type
>   type(T) :: Tobj
> 
>   Sobj = S(1)
>   Tobj = T(Sobj)
> 
>   S2obj = S2(1,2)
>   print *, S2obj%n, S2obj%m
> 
> end program
> 
> Actually pr49213 is a collection of different bugs, one being this PR. IMO
> pr49213 should be split along the different bugs.

The patch of comment #7 fixes the above as well.

Cheers

Paul