From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5996 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2015 10:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5947 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2015 10:58:40 -0000 From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64783] -march=armv8.1-a should be supported Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03373.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64783 Richard Earnshaw changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2015-01-29 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- Agreed, but for GCC-5, I would expect the best we could do would be to pass the appropriate flags through to the assembler, to permit inline assembly to use the new instructions.