From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-475070-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29167 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2015 12:10:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29085 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2015 12:10:45 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64798-4-484h7fC4PW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03064.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ is unnecessarily large, e.g. on i?86-linux, it is 16,
while you only need to guarantee 8-byte alignment.
Isn't the bug just in the badalloc1.C testcase, if it provides its own malloc,
it should IMHO guarantee the system malloc alignments (generally, something
like alignment of
union U
{
  long long ll;
  double d;
  long double ld;
  void *p;
};
.