From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 519 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2015 12:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 430 invoked by uid 55); 27 Jan 2015 12:16:05 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03066.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- > Created attachment 34591 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34591&action=edit > patch > > Ok, so it was bogus to assume size_t would cover the largest alignment needed. > Can test check the attached patch please? Initial testing (just rebuilding libstdc++ and re-running the test) looked good. I'll fire off a full bootstrap for good measure, but that will take a bit. Thanks. Rainer