From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-475085-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32216 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2015 12:42:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32076 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2015 12:42:33 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64798-4-jRSHn79Ny7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03079.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think aligned attribute is similarly useless for this, I'd really go for
testing alignments you need, rather than expecting some magic value.  I'm not
aware of any target that would have bigger alignment for say
char/short/int/long than long long, ditto with float/double, so I'd just check
maximum of
long long, long double, void * alignment.