From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11798 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2015 05:32:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11730 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2015 05:32:47 -0000 From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/64801] [5 Regression] kernel build failure due to ICF Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03344.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64801 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, we do not inline it because creae_wrapper decides so: Index: cgraphunit.c =================================================================== --- cgraphunit.c (revision 220229) +++ cgraphunit.c (working copy) @@ -2427,7 +2427,6 @@ cgraph_node::create_wrapper (cgraph_node } expand_thunk (false, true); - e->call_stmt_cannot_inline_p = true; /* Inline summary set-up. */ analyze (); Martin, perhaps this is leftover of some debugging? We ought to give inliner freedom to re-duplicate the unified function body when it seems profitable (like here)