From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13817 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2015 11:13:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13579 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2015 11:13:51 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/64809] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03050.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 34590 [details] > gcc5-pr64809.patch > > IMHO in any case we should apply something like the attached patch, there is > no point to even look at the debug stmts and TER really shouldn't make any > guarantees for uses in debug stmts, those must be by definition ignored for > TER purposes. Whether that is sufficient is another question. Agreed.