From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-475104-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25371 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2015 16:09:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25265 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2015 16:09:31 -0000
From: "alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64814] std::copy_n advances InputIterator one *less* time than necessary.
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64814-4-iA1LiHghnV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64814-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64814-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg03099.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64814

--- Comment #2 from Anquietas <alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> The problem is that increments to the input iterator happen inside
> the copy_n call, to a copy of the iterator not to readIter itself.
The copy_n implementation I provided produces the same behaviour as the for
loop, even with copying the iterator.