public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64814] std::copy_n advances InputIterator one *less* time than necessary. Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:06:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-64814-4-wC8epuFsNC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-64814-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64814 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think the behaviour you're seeing is correct (and Clang gives the same result). The problem is that increments to the input iterator happen inside the copy_n call, to a copy of the iterator not to readIter itself. This means it is not equivalent to your for (int j = 0; j < 4; ++j) loop which operates directly on readIter. Each time through the outer loop the readIter variable has not been incremented, so has not cached the next element from the input stream.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-27 16:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-01-27 3:49 [Bug libstdc++/64814] New: " alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk 2015-01-27 11:28 ` [Bug libstdc++/64814] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-27 16:06 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-01-27 16:09 ` alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk 2015-01-27 16:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-27 16:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-27 16:40 ` alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk 2015-01-27 16:51 ` alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk 2015-01-27 17:06 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-28 13:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-29 21:06 ` alex-j-a at hotmail dot co.uk
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-64814-4-wC8epuFsNC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).