From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24099 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 15:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23972 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 15:47:30 -0000 From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01208.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14) > > > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold > > > on a ppc64 test machine. > > > > Does it build without my patch? > > Yes. So all I've tested is that it doesn't crash. Can you lower file descriptor limit such that GCC crashes without my patch and works with my patch?