From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16316 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 15:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16265 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 15:43:17 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01207.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14) > > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold > > on a ppc64 test machine. > > Does it build without my patch? Yes. So all I've tested is that it doesn't crash.