public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/64843] New: miscompilation of atomic_fetch_add on atomic pointer type
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64843-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64843

            Bug ID: 64843
           Summary: miscompilation of atomic_fetch_add on atomic pointer
                    type
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk

#include <stdatomic.h>
int *_Atomic p;
void f() { atomic_fetch_add(&p, 1); }

gives

    pushq    %rbp
    movq    %rsp, %rbp
    lock addq    $1, p(%rip)
    popq    %rbp
    ret

... which is wrong; gcc should add 4 to p, not 1.

C11's atomic_fetch_add seems very difficult to implement with GCC's current set
of builtins (you could in principle use _Generic to detect whether you have an
atomic integer type).

To this end, Clang adds a __c11_atomic_fetch_add builtin which provides the
correct C11 semantics (premultiply by sizeof(*x) for an atomic pointer type) of
atomic_fetch_add_explicit. Clang's __c11_... builtins also enforce some of the
other C11 rules; for instance, only pointers to _Atomic types are permitted, so
they may be valuable to add to GCC independent of this bug.


             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-28 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28 19:38 richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk [this message]
2015-01-28 20:38 ` [Bug c/64843] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-28 21:44 ` richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk
2015-01-28 23:20 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-01-28 23:24 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-01-29  0:05 ` richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk
2015-01-29  1:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-64843-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).