From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-481165-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 67936 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2015 01:21:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67899 invoked by uid 48); 23 Mar 2015 01:21:13 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64860] [5 Regression] multiple definition of typeinfo in 5.0 (4.9.2 works)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 04:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-64860-4-SC5Q0iYjFS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64860-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64860-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg02309.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860

--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35100
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35100&action=edit
partial patch

Hi,
this is a patch that adds necessary checks into resolution code. Basically if
static linking is anticipated, we can not derive much of useful info from
PREVAILING_DEF/PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP and must anticipate that static
linking may change these and drop comdat groups.

THe catch is that someone needs to pass -r to lto1 that is not currently
happening (I verified that if I hack opts.c to set incremental_linking to true
the testcase works).

With -r option, I can imagine that lto-wrapper can do it, because we get:
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-c' '-fmath-errno' '-fsigned-zeros' '-ftrapping-math'
'-fno-trapv' '-fno-openmp' '-fno-openacc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
'-O2' '-B' './' '-O2' '-r' '-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
'-fltrans-output-list=/tmp/cc3o3UIr.ltrans.out' '-fwpa'
'-fresolution=/tmp/cchYXuvF.res

I donot know hwere -r gets dropped though.  But the testcase uses -Wl,-r that
may need LTO plugin extension?