public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit.
@ 2015-01-31 17:03 cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:05 ` [Bug c++/64887] " cth027 at yahoo dot de
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cth027 at yahoo dot de @ 2015-01-31 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887

            Bug ID: 64887
           Summary: Brace initialization of array members when move
                    constructor is deleted or implicit.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: cth027 at yahoo dot de

Created attachment 34634
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34634&action=edit
Test case 1: Failure to compile (move and copy ctors are deleted)

The initialisation of member arrays of type A fail to compile when move
constructor of A is deleted or implicitely defined and A has a member which is
not a base type.  

Testcase1 fails to compile because move constructor of A is deleted.  The same
code compiles, when the string member of A is removed (Testcase2) or if the
string member of A is replaced with an int member (Testcase3).

Testcase4 fails to compile because the copy constructor of A is deleted, the
move construcor being implicietly defined.  The same code compiles if the move
constructor is user defined (Testcase5).

The bug could be related to bug 63707, but it's broader (move and not only copy
constructor) and unrelated to user defined destructor.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/64887] Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit.
  2015-01-31 17:03 [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit cth027 at yahoo dot de
@ 2015-01-31 17:05 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:06 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cth027 at yahoo dot de @ 2015-01-31 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887

--- Comment #1 from Christophe <cth027 at yahoo dot de> ---
Created attachment 34635
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34635&action=edit
Test case 2: same code compile if private member removed


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/64887] Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit.
  2015-01-31 17:03 [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:05 ` [Bug c++/64887] " cth027 at yahoo dot de
@ 2015-01-31 17:06 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:07 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cth027 at yahoo dot de @ 2015-01-31 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887

--- Comment #2 from Christophe <cth027 at yahoo dot de> ---
Created attachment 34636
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34636&action=edit
Test case 2: same code compiles if private string member replace by int member


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/64887] Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit.
  2015-01-31 17:03 [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:05 ` [Bug c++/64887] " cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:06 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
@ 2015-01-31 17:07 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 17:08 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 20:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cth027 at yahoo dot de @ 2015-01-31 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887

--- Comment #3 from Christophe <cth027 at yahoo dot de> ---
Created attachment 34637
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34637&action=edit
Test case 4: Failure to compile (copy ctor deleted, move implicit)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/64887] Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit.
  2015-01-31 17:03 [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit cth027 at yahoo dot de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-01-31 17:07 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
@ 2015-01-31 17:08 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
  2015-01-31 20:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cth027 at yahoo dot de @ 2015-01-31 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887

--- Comment #4 from Christophe <cth027 at yahoo dot de> ---
Created attachment 34638
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34638&action=edit
Test case 2: same code compile if user-defined move ctor


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/64887] Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit.
  2015-01-31 17:03 [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit cth027 at yahoo dot de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-01-31 17:08 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
@ 2015-01-31 20:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-31 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I maintain what I said on stackoverflow, this is PR 63707. Just because there
are other ways to reproduce the bug doesn't make it a separate bug, that just
means there should be additional testcases on the original bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63707 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-31 20:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-31 17:03 [Bug c++/64887] New: Brace initialization of array members when move constructor is deleted or implicit cth027 at yahoo dot de
2015-01-31 17:05 ` [Bug c++/64887] " cth027 at yahoo dot de
2015-01-31 17:06 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
2015-01-31 17:07 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
2015-01-31 17:08 ` cth027 at yahoo dot de
2015-01-31 20:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).