public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex.Velenko at arm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/64916] New: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64916-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916

            Bug ID: 64916
           Summary: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes
                    gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: Alex.Velenko at arm dot com
                CC: amker.cheng at gmail dot com, fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com,
                    law at redhat dot com, marcus.shawcroft at arm dot com
             Build: arm-none-eabi

Created attachment 34650
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34650&action=edit
Tar with patched and non-patched rtl dump file tars

In pr43920-2.c code block for "return -1;" c statement is not getting reused
after
ira.c update_equiv_regs patch. I believe svn it's number is r216169.
Reason - patch removes "(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int -1
[0xffffffffffffffff])" note in ira pass, which prevents jump2 optimization.
This information still needs to be passed to jump2 pass.
See rtl dump attachments below.


             reply	other threads:[~2015-02-03 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-03 12:34 Alex.Velenko at arm dot com [this message]
2015-02-03 13:38 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/64916] [5.0 regression] " ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04  2:52 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09  0:06 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/64916] [5 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09 23:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/64916] " law at redhat dot com
2015-03-12 16:55 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21  5:23 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21  5:41 ` law at redhat dot com
2015-04-22  8:51 ` Alex.Velenko at arm dot com
2015-04-22 13:28 ` Alex.Velenko at arm dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-64916-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).