From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14884 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 16:38:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14806 invoked by uid 48); 3 Feb 2015 16:37:59 -0000 From: "oystein at gnubg dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: oystein at gnubg dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64918 --- Comment #2 from =C3=98ystein Sch=C3=B8nning-Johansen --- Really insightful, Joseph. I do understand the warning a bit better now. I = have not looked into the GCC parsing code, but based on your description and my (limited) understanding of the problem, I guess a fix is not trivial? Can I suppress this warning in any way? -=C3=98 >>From gcc-bugs-return-475899-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 03 16:49:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1652 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 16:49:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1544 invoked by uid 48); 3 Feb 2015 16:49:11 -0000 From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/54303] -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections and -fmerge-constants do not work well together Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 Content-length: 539 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303 Segher Boessenkool changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot gnu.org Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool --- Mine.