From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27983 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 03:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27868 invoked by uid 48); 4 Feb 2015 03:00:28 -0000 From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [4.9/5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > > gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 seems to fail at random on trunk > > and 4.9 branch: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg00308.html > > > > It is caused by r220191. > > HJ, > > I'll take a look at this tomorrow night. I find it to be enormously > surprising that r220191 is causing this regression. I rather think that I > have exposed another underlying bug. > > Thanks > > Paul I've been seeing this test fail in cross-testing on arm-linux-gnueabi{hf} too. However native testresults from gcc-testresults don't show this coming up often. Not sure what's going on here. Ramana