From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3598 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 16:03:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2893 invoked by uid 48); 3 Feb 2015 16:03:52 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 with -fPIC Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- r220371 generates identical code to r220350 on this testcase. Do you mean libgfortran.so has been miscompiled? But then really -fPIC shouldn't matter here, as libgfortran is built with -fpic, and I've certainly bootstrapped/regtested my patch on both i686-linux and x86_64-linux.