public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-02-04 16:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 16:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-04 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34664
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34664&action=edit
Test case failing with g++ -fsanitize=address test.ii
The attached test case fails for me with
GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=yes g++ test.ii -fsanitize=address
with the same message:
g++: error: test.ii: -fcompare-debug failure (length)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-04 16:41 ` [Bug target/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-04 16:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 17:16 ` [Bug debug/64935] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-04 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> The attached test case fails for me with
> with the same message:
> g++: error: test.ii: -fcompare-debug failure (length)
That's with x86-64-gnu-linux in my case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-04 16:41 ` [Bug target/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 16:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-04 17:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 17:47 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-04 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> Started with r220316.
Mine (comment 2) also fails with r220315 - but it is also a 5.0 regression.
Hence, I filled a new PR for it: PR64937.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-04 17:16 ` [Bug debug/64935] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-04 17:47 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 19:32 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-04 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Will investigate tomorrow.
The patch in question fixed a debug miscompare problem on arm-linux-gnueabi.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-04 17:47 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-04 19:32 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-05 9:05 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-04 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
trippels@gcc2-power8 % cat wp512.i
int a[] = {}, b[] = {}, c[] = {}, d[] = {}, e[] = {}, f[] = {}, h[] = {};
int g[] = { 0 };
int i, l, s, w, x, y, z, t2, t3, t5;
unsigned long j, m, o, t4;
long k, n, p, q, r, t, u, v, t1;
fn1 ()
{
int t6;
for (; i; i++)
{
t5 = a[q] ^ b[p >> 1] ^ c[o >> 1 & 1] ^ d[n >> 1 & 1] ^ e[m >> 1 & 1]
^ f[l >> 1 & 1] ^ g[0] ^ h[j & 1];
t4 = a[j] ^ b[q >> 1] ^ c[p] ^ d[o] ^ e[n] ^ f[m] ^ g[l >> 8] ^ h[k];
t3 = a[k >> 1] ^ b[j & 5] ^ d[p >> 32] ^ e[o >> 4] ^ f[n >> 6]
^ g[m >> 8] ^ h[l];
t2 = a[l >> 6] ^ b[k & 1] ^ c[j >> 1] ^ d[q >> 32] ^ e[p >> 4]
^ f[o >> 6] ^ g[n >> 8] ^ h[m & 1];
t1 = a[m >> 6] ^ b[l & 1] ^ c[k & 15] ^ d[j >> 2] ^ e[q >> 4] ^ f[p >> 6]
^ g[o >> 8] ^ h[n & 1];
z = a[n >> 56] ^ b[m & 15] ^ c[l & 15] ^ d[k >> 2] ^ e[j >> 4]
^ f[q >> 6] ^ g[p >> 8] ^ h[o & 1];
y = a[o >> 56] ^ b[n & 15] ^ c[m >> 40] ^ d[l >> 2] ^ e[k >> 4]
^ f[j >> 6] ^ g[q >> 8] ^ h[p & 1];
x = a[p >> 56] ^ b[o & 15] ^ c[n >> 40] ^ d[m >> 2] ^ e[l >> 4]
^ f[k >> 6] ^ g[j >> 8] ^ h[q & 1];
q = j = t4;
k = t3;
l = t2;
m = t1;
n = z;
o = y;
p = a[t6] ^ b[0] ^ c[w] ^ d[v] ^ e[u] ^ f[t] ^ g[s] ^ h[r];
t4 = a[r >> 1] ^ b[t6 & 1] ^ d[w >> 1] ^ e[v >> 1] ^ f[u >> 1]
^ g[t >> 1] ^ h[s];
t3 = a[s >> 6] ^ b[r & 1] ^ c[t6 & 5] ^ d[0] ^ e[w >> 4] ^ f[v >> 6]
^ g[u >> 8] ^ h[t & 1];
t2 = a[t >> 6] ^ b[s] ^ c[r & 15] ^ d[t6 >> 1] ^ e[0] ^ f[w >> 6]
^ g[v >> 8] ^ h[u & 1];
t1 = a[u >> 6] ^ b[t & 15] ^ c[s & 5] ^ d[r >> 32] ^ e[t6 >> 4]
^ g[w >> 8] ^ h[v & 1];
z = a[v >> 56] ^ b[u >> 48 & 1] ^ c[t >> 40 & 1] ^ d[s] ^ e[r >> 1 & 1]
^ f[t6 >> 1 & 1] ^ g[0] ^ h[w & 1] ^ z;
t6 = t5;
r = t4;
s = 0;
t = u = t1;
v = z;
w = y;
}
}
trippels@gcc2-power8 % GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=1 gcc -std=gnu89 -O2 -c wp512.i
gcc: error: wp512.i: -fcompare-debug failure (length)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-04 19:32 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-05 9:05 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-05 9:06 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-05 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34674&action=edit
Initial patch
Marcus,
Would you please bootstrap / test this patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-05 9:05 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-05 9:06 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-05 11:52 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-05 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #8 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Markus,
I'll test it on x86/x86_64 and arm/aarch64, but I don't have a powerpc box to
bootstrap on.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-05 9:06 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-05 11:52 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-07 10:54 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-05 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Your patch bootstraps / tests fine on ppc64. GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=1 kernel build
also succeeds.
Thanks.
(If you want access to ppc machines get a compile farm account:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
There are several POWER boxes available.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-05 11:52 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-07 10:54 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09 14:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-07 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Do you plan to post your patch to gcc-patches, Maxim?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-07 10:54 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-09 14:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 13:24 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-09 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-09 14:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-10 13:24 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-12 20:51 ` law at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #11 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm traveling at the moment, and will work on this in the week of Jan 16.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-10 13:24 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-12 20:51 ` law at redhat dot com
2015-02-12 20:53 ` law at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
*** Bug 64966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-12 20:51 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-12 20:53 ` law at redhat dot com
2015-02-17 9:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-12 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 34742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34742&action=edit
Additional testcase
Additional testcase. For x86_64
$ gcc -O -fschedule-insns --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0 -fcompare-debug
testcase.c
gcc: error: testcase.c: -fcompare-debug failure
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-12 20:53 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-17 9:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-17 9:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-17 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Any progress on this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-17 9:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-17 9:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 10:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-17 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #15 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Working right now.
I'm trying a second approach to fixing this problem more cleanly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-17 9:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-18 10:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 14:35 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-19 14:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-18 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #34674|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #16 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34799
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34799&action=edit
Patch v2
I'm happy with this version of the patch and will post it for review after
testing.
Markus, I would appreciate you testing this patch on powerpc to your
satisfaction.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-18 10:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-18 14:35 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-19 14:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-18 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #16)
> Created attachment 34799 [details]
> Patch v2
>
> I'm happy with this version of the patch and will post it for review after
> testing.
>
> Markus, I would appreciate you testing this patch on powerpc to your
> satisfaction.
Looks good on ppc64. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-18 14:35 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-19 14:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-19 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Feb 19 08:31:14 2015
New Revision: 220808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR64935
* haifa-sched.c (enum rfs_decision, rfs_str): Remove RFS_DEBUG.
(rank_for_schedule_debug): Update.
(ready_sort): Make static. Move sorting logic to ...
(ready_sort_debug, ready_sort_real): New static functions.
(schedule_block): Sort both debug insns and real insns in preparation
for ready list trimming. Improve debug output.
* sched-int.h (ready_sort): Remove global declaration.
* gcc.dg/pr64935-1.c, gcc.dg/pr64935-2.c: New tests.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64935-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64935-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/haifa-sched.c
trunk/gcc/sched-int.h
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-19 14:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-04 16:41 ` [Bug target/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 16:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 17:16 ` [Bug debug/64935] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 17:47 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-04 19:32 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-05 9:05 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-05 9:06 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-05 11:52 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-07 10:54 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09 14:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 13:24 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-12 20:51 ` law at redhat dot com
2015-02-12 20:53 ` law at redhat dot com
2015-02-17 9:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-17 9:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 10:22 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 14:35 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-19 14:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).