From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476001-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23018 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 17:16:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22895 invoked by uid 48); 4 Feb 2015 17:16:04 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64935-4-rYUpFdx99R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> Started with r220316. 

Mine (comment 2) also fails with r220315 - but it is also a 5.0 regression.

Hence, I filled a new PR for it: PR64937.