From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3679 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2015 14:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3586 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2015 14:34:47 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00814.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, -fabi-version=0 (which is the default now) has always behaved that way. The question is if we want to change that or not.