From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476232-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28701 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2015 12:45:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28663 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2015 12:45:26 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64958] New: Warn if INTENT(IN) is changed by passing to no-intent argument
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-64958-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00565.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958

            Bug ID: 64958
           Summary: Warn if INTENT(IN) is changed by passing to no-intent
                    argument
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

Consider the following code:

module foo
  implicit none
contains
  subroutine bar(n)
    integer, intent(in) :: n
    print *,"bar before dusty", n
    call dusty(n)
    print *,"bar after dusty", n
  end subroutine bar
end module foo

program main
  use foo
  implicit none
  integer :: n
  n = 5
  call bar(n)
end program main

subroutine dusty(n)
  integer n
  n = n - 1
end

What "dusty" does is illegal, but it may not be easy for the programmer
to catch this (especially if "dusty" is in a library).

So, it would be nice if -fcheck=all would contain a check which checked
if intent(in) dummy arguments are changed by being passed to
intent(none).