[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

["LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968

--- Comment #30 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(I added some debug code to Bugzilla to try to understand what's wrong. Just
ignore this email.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 01 09:24:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70535 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 09:24:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70380 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2015 09:24:32 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 09:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-FMkmP0JdRj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2
Content-length: 163

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968

--- Comment #31 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(ignore this one as well)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485174-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 01 09:36:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485174-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85051 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 09:36:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85019 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2015 09:36:15 -0000
From: "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65951] [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 09:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65951-4-KG1npIBMby@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2
Content-length: 361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide951

--- Comment #3 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes you are right, we have no V2DI multiply. We do have V2DI shifts + add,
however, which would work well for some constants, e.g. the multiply by 16 in
PR/65952; perhaps the vectorizer does not consider such possibilities (whereas
we do for scalar code).