[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

["LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968

--- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Created attachment 34735
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34735&action=edit
GCC patch for 5.0, v1

No code changes compared to 4.4, but the patch for 4.4 didn't apply cleanly to
5.0 due to some context changes. So I rediffed it again, now using git.
>From gcc-bugs-return-476924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 11 20:46:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30502 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30385 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:12 -0000
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64927] [4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64927-4-rGjqqeZf4J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01257.txt.bz2
Content-length: 894

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd927

--- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > The revision numbers you refer to belong to the 4.9-branch.
>
> Indeed -> I was trying to find the commit that fixed the problem (without
> success).
>
> > IMO it is not fixed on 4.8. If there is no easy solution, I'd rather
> > prefer to mark it in an appropriate way (wontfix?), so that others
> > can see that this problem is known for particular gcc versions.
>
> I think the only "appropriate way" is FIXED as it is the case for 4.9 and
> trunk. Closing as WONTFIX will be misleading for these revisions. Note that
> 4.8 will be closed pretty soon.

My reasoning is based on the observation that Tobias Burnus
just closed PR64474 as WONTFIX for the similar reason:
4.9 and 5 don't have the resp. bug, all 4.8.x have.