From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30812 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30708 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:27 -0000 From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01258.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64968 --- Comment #6 from Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Buclin = --- Created attachment 34735 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D34735&action=3Dedit GCC patch for 5.0, v1 No code changes compared to 4.4, but the patch for 4.4 didn't apply cleanly= to 5.0 due to some context changes. So I rediffed it again, now using git. >>From gcc-bugs-return-476924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 11 20:46:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30502 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30385 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:12 -0000 From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/64927] [4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gmx dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01257.txt.bz2 Content-length: 894 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 --- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > The revision numbers you refer to belong to the 4.9-branch. > > Indeed -> I was trying to find the commit that fixed the problem (without > success). > > > IMO it is not fixed on 4.8. If there is no easy solution, I'd rather > > prefer to mark it in an appropriate way (wontfix?), so that others > > can see that this problem is known for particular gcc versions. > > I think the only "appropriate way" is FIXED as it is the case for 4.9 and > trunk. Closing as WONTFIX will be misleading for these revisions. Note that > 4.8 will be closed pretty soon. My reasoning is based on the observation that Tobias Burnus just closed PR64474 as WONTFIX for the similar reason: 4.9 and 5 don't have the resp. bug, all 4.8.x have.