public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
@ 2015-02-07 14:23 LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-07 14:44 ` [Bug web/64968] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (32 more replies)
0 siblings, 33 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-02-07 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Bug ID: 64968
Summary: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: LpSolit at netscape dot net
Reporter: LpSolit at netscape dot net
Bugzilla 5.0 reached Release Candidate stage, and should now be stable enough
to be used in production. Unless someone has strong objections, I plan to
upgrade both GCC Bugzilla and Sourceware Bugzilla to 5.0rc2 in the coming days.
For a list of new features, please read
https://www.bugzilla.org/releases/5.0/release-notes.html#feat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-02-07 14:44 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09 10:39 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (31 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-07 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Would it be possible to lift the restriction on account creation
after the update?
The new ability to tag spam should come handy...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-07 14:44 ` [Bug web/64968] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-09 10:39 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-09 11:43 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (30 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-02-09 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-02-09
CC| |fche at redhat dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> Would it be possible to lift the restriction on account creation
> after the update?
This decision doesn't belong to me. CC'ing Frank.
>From gcc-bugs-return-476443-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Feb 09 10:56:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476443-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27838 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2015 10:56:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27754 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2015 10:56:37 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-64813-4-EwR2eR5mCb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2
Content-length: 241
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34702
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34702&action=edit
Suggested patch
>From gcc-bugs-return-476442-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Feb 09 10:56:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476442-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27046 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2015 10:56:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26966 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2015 10:56:04 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64813-4-JnEMNyYNxC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2
Content-length: 344
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hello.
Sorry for delay, I was away last week. Following patch should prevent a
creation of return values for cases where the called function is noreturn.
May I ask you for testing on a darwin machine?
Thanks,
Martin
>From gcc-bugs-return-476444-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Feb 09 11:06:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476444-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22931 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2015 11:06:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22842 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2015 11:06:20 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/64978] [5 Regression] ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1060
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64978-4-xQbRmOi20k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64978-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64978-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00777.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2123
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd978
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
trippels@gcc2-power8 makeconv % cat msgfmt.ii
typedef enum
{
} UErrorCode;
class A
{
virtual A *m_fn1 () const;
};
class B : A
{
B (const B &);
A *m_fn1 () const;
class PluralSelectorProvider
{
public:
PluralSelectorProvider ();
} pluralProvider;
PluralSelectorProvider ordinalProvider;
void m_fn2 (const B &, UErrorCode &);
};
UErrorCode a;
B::B (const B &p1) { m_fn2 (p1, a); }
A *
B::m_fn1 () const
{
B (*this);
}
void
B::m_fn2 (const B &, UErrorCode &)
{
for (;;)
m_fn1 ();
}
trippels@gcc2-power8 makeconv % cat reldtfmt.ii
typedef enum
{
} UErrorCode;
namespace icu_52
{
class UnicodeString
{
public:
UnicodeString (int);
};
}
enum UDateFormatStyle
{
};
namespace icu_52
{
class Locale;
class RelativeDateFormat
{
RelativeDateFormat (UDateFormatStyle, UDateFormatStyle, const Locale &,
UErrorCode &);
void m_fn1 ();
};
class MessageFormat
{
public:
MessageFormat (const UnicodeString &, UErrorCode &);
};
RelativeDateFormat::RelativeDateFormat (UDateFormatStyle, UDateFormatStyle,
const Locale &, UErrorCode &)
{
m_fn1 ();
}
UErrorCode a;
void
RelativeDateFormat::m_fn1 ()
{
MessageFormat (0, a);
}
}
trippels@gcc2-power8 makeconv % g++ -fPIC -flto -O3 -fvisibility=hidden
-std=c++11 -c msgfmt.ii
trippels@gcc2-power8 makeconv % g++ -fPIC -flto -O3 -fvisibility=hidden
-std=c++11 -c reldtfmt.ii
trippels@gcc2-power8 makeconv %
/home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../libexec/gcc/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.0.0/lto1
-quiet -fwpa msgfmt.o reldtfmt.o
lto1: internal compiler error: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at
ipa-cp.c:1060
0x10d1bbef ipcp_verify_propagated_values()
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:1060
0x10d1dcfb ipcp_propagate_stage
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:2761
0x10d1dcfb ipcp_driver
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:4410
0x10d1dcfb execute
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:4505
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-07 14:44 ` [Bug web/64968] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09 10:39 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-02-09 11:43 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-02-11 14:37 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (29 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-09 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
If the spammer problem is brought under better control with bz5, sure.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-09 11:43 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-11 14:37 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-11 16:33 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (28 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-02-11 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 2873 bytes --]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Bugzilla 5.0 is not available from bzr, it requires git. But there is already a
.git repository in the root bugzilla/ directory, which requires root
permissions to be read. What is git used for currently?
>From gcc-bugs-return-476859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 11 14:40:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16985 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 14:40:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16884 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 14:40:53 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65014] [5 Regression] ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-65014-4-mwBjPzOW3y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01192.txt.bz2
Content-length: 690
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide014
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34728
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id4728&actioníit
gcc5-pr65015.patch
Untested fix. Or alternatively we could fold those STRIP_NOPS adjusted trees
back to the original type, but would that be worth it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-11 14:37 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-02-11 16:33 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-02-11 20:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (27 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-11 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #5 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
The current .git repos are there as a backup.
I'll move them out of the way.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-11 16:33 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-11 20:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-11 20:48 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (26 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-02-11 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Created attachment 34735
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34735&action=edit
GCC patch for 5.0, v1
No code changes compared to 4.4, but the patch for 4.4 didn't apply cleanly to
5.0 due to some context changes. So I rediffed it again, now using git.
>From gcc-bugs-return-476924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 11 20:46:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30502 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30385 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:46:12 -0000
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64927] [4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64927-4-rGjqqeZf4J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01257.txt.bz2
Content-length: 894
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd927
--- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > The revision numbers you refer to belong to the 4.9-branch.
>
> Indeed -> I was trying to find the commit that fixed the problem (without
> success).
>
> > IMO it is not fixed on 4.8. If there is no easy solution, I'd rather
> > prefer to mark it in an appropriate way (wontfix?), so that others
> > can see that this problem is known for particular gcc versions.
>
> I think the only "appropriate way" is FIXED as it is the case for 4.9 and
> trunk. Closing as WONTFIX will be misleading for these revisions. Note that
> 4.8 will be closed pretty soon.
My reasoning is based on the observation that Tobias Burnus
just closed PR64474 as WONTFIX for the similar reason:
4.9 and 5 don't have the resp. bug, all 4.8.x have.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-11 20:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-02-11 20:48 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-18 18:30 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (25 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-02-11 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Created attachment 34736
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34736&action=edit
GCC extension for 5.0, v1
This is exactly the same GCC extension as for 4.4.5. So far, it seems to work
fine (on my local test installation).
>From gcc-bugs-return-476927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 11 20:51:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12108 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:51:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12033 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:51:46 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65028] [5 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-65028-4-WP9EOYtTM4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65028-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65028-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01260.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide028
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, the code dies realtively soon:
Breakpoint 1, main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffec28) at example.cc:116
116 {
(gdb) n
169 NameSet rownames;
(gdb)
170 NameSet colnames;
(gdb)
186 for(optidx = 1; optidx < argc; optidx++)
(gdb)
188 if (*argv[optidx] != '-')
(gdb)
254 if ((argc - optidx) < 1)
(gdb)
267 MySoPlex work(type, representation);
(gdb)
262 Param::setEpsilon(epsilon);
(gdb)
263 Param::setVerbose(verbose);
(gdb)
265 std::cout.setf(std::ios::scientific | std::ios::showpoint);
(gdb)
267 MySoPlex work(type, representation);
(gdb)
262 Param::setEpsilon(epsilon);
(gdb)
267 MySoPlex work(type, representation);
(gdb)
213 timelimit = atof(&argv[optidx][2]);
Clearly I do not pass any option, so there is no need for code getting there at
all.
-fno-ipa-cp fixes the bug, so I suspect it is a bug in ipa-cp WRT redirection
to local functions with clonnes...
Martin, perhaps you can spot it faster?
Honza
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-11 20:48 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-18 18:30 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-27 15:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-18 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Created attachment 35354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35354&action=edit
GCC extension for 5.0, v2
And the corresponding new extension.
>From gcc-bugs-return-483985-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Apr 18 18:47:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-483985-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65149 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2015 18:47:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65115 invoked by uid 48); 18 Apr 2015 18:47:41 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/65801] [5/6 Regression] Allow -Wno-narrowing to silence stricter C++11 narrowing rules
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-65801-4-3I78jRJMo7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65801-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65801-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01537.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1312
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-18
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Allow -Wno-narrowing to |[5/6 Regression] Allow
|silence stricter C++11 |-Wno-narrowing to silence
|narrowing rules |stricter C++11 narrowing
| |rules
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes. This also breaks building Chromium.
markus@x4 ~ % echo "int main () {int i = { 0xFFFFFFFF };}" | g++ -std=c++11
-Wno-narrowing -x c++ -
<stdin>: In function ‘int main()’:
<stdin>:1:35: error: narrowing conversion of ‘4294967295u’ from ‘unsigned int’
to ‘int’ inside { }
While the standard is clear that this is an error,
accepting -Wno-narrowing as in 4.8, 4.9 and clang looks acceptable to me.
>From gcc-bugs-return-483986-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Apr 18 19:04:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-483986-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5345 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2015 19:04:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5312 invoked by uid 48); 18 Apr 2015 19:04:48 -0000
From: "dimhen at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 19:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dimhen at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-65802-4-O4Pup37Odb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01538.txt.bz2
Content-length: 415
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide802
Dmitry G. Dyachenko <dimhen at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko <dimhen at gmail dot com> ---
r222168 PASS
r222174 FAIL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-18 18:30 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-27 15:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 17:39 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (23 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-27 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hello, not sure this is due to the upgrade, but the attachment
appears empty in the page:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35405&action=edit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-27 15:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-27 17:39 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-04-27 18:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (22 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2015-04-27 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #13 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #12)
> Hello, not sure this is due to the upgrade, but the attachment
> appears empty in the page:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35405&action=edit
This appears to be due to CSS/JS goo marking that attachment textarea as
"display: none !important" for some reason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-27 17:39 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2015-04-27 18:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-27 19:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (21 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-27 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #14 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #12)
> Hello, not sure this is due to the upgrade, but the attachment
> appears empty in the page:
That's unrelated to the upgrade. Your web browser is unable to display files of
type text/x-fortran, that's why.
What you want is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622455
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #13)
> This appears to be due to CSS/JS goo marking that attachment textarea as
> "display: none !important" for some reason.
The reason being that you are looking at the "edit comment" field. So this
behavior is correct.
>From gcc-bugs-return-484775-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 27 18:52:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484775-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26518 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 18:52:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25704 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2015 18:52:23 -0000
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-t0CvIH7uXS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02327.txt.bz2
Content-length: 395
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #14)
> That's unrelated to the upgrade. Your web browser is unable to display files
> of type text/x-fortran, that's why.
>
> What you want is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622455
>
Ah OK. Thanks.
>From gcc-bugs-return-484776-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 27 19:15:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484776-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71966 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 19:15:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71906 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2015 19:15:30 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65903] Line continuation followed by comment character in string fails to compile
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-65903-4-AmeKsvFZ5v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65903-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65903-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02328.txt.bz2
Content-length: 517
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide903
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I will have a look. Thanks for the report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-27 18:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-27 19:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-28 16:28 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-27 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #35353|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #16 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Created attachment 35409
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35409&action=edit
GCC patch for 5.0, v3
To make Mikael happy, I'm going to apply this patch which will sniff the
content type of the submitted attachment and will convert it to text/plain if
it's of type text/x-*.
>From gcc-bugs-return-484781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 27 19:55:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 378 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 19:55:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 330 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2015 19:55:39 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-2BLxHMN2PC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02333.txt.bz2
Content-length: 376
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #17 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Patch applied. Mikael, the next time you upload a f90 script, Bugzilla will
correctly detect it as text/plain. Note that it won't convert the MIME type of
already uploaded attachments (which you can manually fix to text/plain
yourself).
>From gcc-bugs-return-484782-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 27 21:35:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484782-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94903 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 21:35:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94838 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2015 21:35:37 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/62258] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-62258-4-jCAGYnD2D8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-62258-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-62258-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02334.txt.bz2
Content-length: 142
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idb258
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk so far
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-27 19:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-28 16:28 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28 18:26 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (19 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-28 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #19 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
See for example:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils.bugs/19841/focus=19855
When this thread is displayed in mutt the highlighted messages appears
in the wrong place.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-28 16:28 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-28 18:26 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-29 12:27 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (18 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-28 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #21 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Markus, did you change your timezone preference between comments 18 and 19? If
yes, which ones did you select?
>From gcc-bugs-return-484892-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Apr 28 18:38:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484892-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91379 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2015 18:38:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91304 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2015 18:38:41 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-7ZqQjZUjuj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02444.txt.bz2
Content-length: 490
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #21)
> Markus, did you change your timezone preference between comments 18 and 19?
> If yes, which ones did you select?
No. But the question makes no sense, because we're talking about mails that
bugzilla automatically sends to the bug mailing lists on every new comment.
And I have no control over these.
>From gcc-bugs-return-484893-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Apr 28 18:43:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484893-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102057 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2015 18:43:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101966 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2015 18:43:16 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-5p4m22OQah@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02445.txt.bz2
Content-length: 539
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #23 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #22)
> No. But the question makes no sense, because we're talking about mails that
> bugzilla automatically sends to the bug mailing lists on every new comment.
> And I have no control over these.
The question makes total sense as I wanted to excluse a possible interaction
between your timezone and the timezone used by Bugzilla to send bugmails. :)
>From gcc-bugs-return-484894-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Apr 28 18:47:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484894-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108634 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2015 18:47:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108597 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2015 18:47:48 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-FZ3Mqj9ZxL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02446.txt.bz2
Content-length: 12481
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #24 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #23)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #22)
> > No. But the question makes no sense, because we're talking about mails that
> > bugzilla automatically sends to the bug mailing lists on every new comment.
> > And I have no control over these.
>
> The question makes total sense as I wanted to excluse a possible interaction
> between your timezone and the timezone used by Bugzilla to send bugmails. :)
Yeah, sorry. I though you were talking about the Sourceware binutils thread...
Here are the headers of comment18 as seen by Gmane:
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.bugs
Subject: [Bug web/6496Here are the headers from comment 18 as seem by gmane:
8] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:44:58 +0000
Lines: 8
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-LDazd6q8EA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430237721 11722 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2015 16:15:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Original-X-From: gcc-bugs-return-484874-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue
Apr 28 18:15:06 2015
Return-path: <gcc-bugs-return-484874-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Envelope-to: gcgb-bugs-2@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from server1.sourceware.org ([209.132.180.131]
helo=sourceware.org)
by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from
<gcc-bugs-return-484874-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>)
id 1Yn8A5-00007b-65
for gcgb-bugs-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:15:05 +0200
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from
:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=eu7
6Jpj++BEoByfYK1WkSgKWYsgqRvq1b0M/KeNitV7ycQgl4ohrGf06aE1Y/832wKH
y/NHq6WvFLytj6vGFKekJhnAeux6xZObH0Enc4lmiW47TFMB7WFG/bhBbk40mNFH
jz4WVwxa05bFqSFaPPVrl7Ym8EqWwrBYwxOOEPzM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from
:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=zsFudk2X+
ANEPRr/cJWaH3SAEF8=; b=jastBc1aGdhM4s2RoZnruY7ZX/FcmBeRB0JEflRMT
68TkmxuDrRvnETjdLSGVZ28Kf18TbSc4ZdK4AYzsQFM5GBTHoRDeehXarAzcwHLq
S1VHzdFA3sOjoz89NpDigZ2MYsn0aX3cj9Y4e783mPOPSRRSqsac1nV1hx7khXPE
4A=
Original-Received: (qmail 122022 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2015 16:15:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:gcc-bugs-unsubscribe-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Original-Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Original-Received: (qmail 121912 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2015 16:14:59 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.bugs:448187
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.bugs/448187>
>From gcc-bugs-return-484895-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Apr 28 19:10:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484895-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9168 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2015 19:10:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9081 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2015 19:10:00 -0000
From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65837-4-pde5L79m2c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02447.txt.bz2
Content-length: 296
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide837
--- Comment #16 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #15)
> I am not understanding why vfpv3-d16 appears in collect_gcc_options in
> run_gcc().
Isn't this because you configured GCC --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-28 18:26 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-29 12:27 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-29 16:02 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-29 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #25 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Did this problem disappear? Or are there still some bugmails today with a wrong
timestamp?
>From gcc-bugs-return-484975-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Apr 29 12:44:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484975-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41929 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2015 12:44:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41887 invoked by uid 48); 29 Apr 2015 12:44:25 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-65931-4-jhjXKI5TTa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02527.txt.bz2
Content-length: 284
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide931
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-29 12:27 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-29 16:02 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 13:48 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-29 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "christian.eggers at kathrein dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.bugs
Subject: [Bug target/65932] New: [5.1 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s
does not boot due to wrong code generation
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:29:49 +0000
Lines: 113
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <bug-65932-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430323200 7510 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2015 16:00:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Original-X-From: gcc-bugs-return-484992-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed
Apr 29 17:59:59 2015
Return-path: <gcc-bugs-return-484992-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Envelope-to: gcgb-bugs-2@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from server1.sourceware.org ([209.132.180.131]
helo=sourceware.org)
by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from
<gcc-bugs-return-484992-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>)
id 1YnUOz-0001Mr-Sk
for gcgb-bugs-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:59:58 +0200
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from
:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=wF4
XpCycQCKvZYEpgslmjeE/iyiMnzvS1lDuekTkvBsh11w0fFLtrheGihbsGd4KOB9
ivtOHv6qMqlEQFpYWzluqxl6rLzXuUCD+WQFy4JkOijERIaAslqvycmQ+a3zAZKZ
1y/iA4Y0U5IceFqB9oakq8ZhmuhC7yETPRNmgnfI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from
:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=MPQLMLxNK
n5OEvc8DOdegu6zUbA=; b=lvJgWyPE2h0vlF+zFQdx9kxE+20elsY465TPyxTUv
f6bSgFWl9zYehzSjTv8mhRd0ogv7ZD2Nuiyyf1wb3gWdeVd8aWJ4fCWuTLRejMA6
XTLhIodTKUNUl5S/0Q8Mdvduu6v2+tZyDSoBFX7ZCDjtR8K3JrhqR8okTbijha6u
mg=
Original-Received: (qmail 114156 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2015 15:59:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:gcc-bugs-unsubscribe-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Original-Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Original-Received: (qmail 114125 invoked by uid 48); 29 Apr 2015 15:59:51 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: christian.eggers at kathrein dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
attachments.created
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.bugs:448305
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.bugs/448305>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-29 16:02 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 13:48 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 16:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (15 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.bugs
Subject: [Bug lto/65559] [5/6 Regression] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in
read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2947
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:15:19 +0000
Lines: 5
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <bug-65559-4-J1UKBy41F4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430401548 13250 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2015 13:45:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:45:48 +0000 (UTC)
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Original-X-From: gcc-bugs-return-485090-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu
Apr 30 15:45:36 2015
Return-path: <gcc-bugs-return-485090-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Envelope-to: gcgb-bugs-2@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from server1.sourceware.org ([209.132.180.131]
helo=sourceware.org)
by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from
<gcc-bugs-return-485090-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>)
id 1YnomS-0003mR-Bh
for gcgb-bugs-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:45:32 +0200
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from
:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=nwh
sN0PU7kTVYuR/f2t2lwRUUHnk7oxYgHMabZP3BkhDNkgbp57w4v8ushqSu24R/zO
/oyUAJ6bDzcydlZJXNSf07CpMFrSZx+Y+HERUHtgrvtag9JOnBnMEIL6fmjLBpcX
hB7WrLxwQxpyVIeq3jI9X/0CRms5sy3U2+YapPfA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from
:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=IQ0EMBz10
AKx1Kp1vnG6OLkLCuk=; b=S1iT7TV03c/1TA7o1PCMMX4pfYprYla5bfJ1hPPH7
IWH3c57//j9D7bKEaJzvl9CcYcosCkFoR+sRsOKdxq1+KjQSSOpIEefIcosn1cen
WAqelyk+laOX72lRNHpr1i3CP7g9bgpCU9dlBJsJJ8QJEo89jWqjfBVOYPZwAUI4
5w=
Original-Received: (qmail 103939 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2015 13:45:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:gcc-bugs-unsubscribe-gcgb-bugs-2=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Original-Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Original-Received: (qmail 103859 invoked by uid 48); 30 Apr 2015 13:45:21 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-65559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.bugs:448403
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.bugs/448403>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-30 13:48 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 16:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-30 20:53 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (14 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-30 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #28 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Maybe is this a coincidence, but all bugmails I found which have a wrong
timestamp have something in common. First of all, the offset is *always* the
same: -05:30. Then, it seems the problem only happens when the clock is close
to :15, :30, :45 or :00, as shown below:
Markus Trippelsdorf 2015-04-28 16:14:58 UTC
H.J. Lu 2015-04-28 16:19:15 UTC
Andreas Schwab 2015-04-28 20:20:10 UTC
Christian Eggers 2015-04-29 15:59:49 UTC
Jonathan Wakely 2015-04-30 09:14:14 UTC
Rainer Emrich 2015-04-30 13:45:19 UTC
@Markus: no need to paste the full email header anymore as I'm getting all
bugmails myself since last night. Just indicate the bug ID and comment ID (or
real timestamp if it's not a new comment), and I will find it. :)
@overseers: to be honest, I don't think this is a bug in Bugzilla itself. I
would tend to a bug or a bad interaction with the MTA, qmail or sendmail. Is
sourceware running some cron job every 15 minutes, which could interact with
Bugzilla sending emails at the same time? And depending on which job is run,
maybe sendmail/qmail is confused and uses the wrong timezone. No idea why the
offset is always -05:30, but this may give sourceware admins some clue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485120-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Apr 30 16:35:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485120-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129464 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2015 16:35:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129146 invoked by uid 48); 30 Apr 2015 16:34:57 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-65931-4-eDhitnPI2s@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02672.txt.bz2
Content-length: 560
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide931
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-30
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
I have already filed Bug ID# 20510039 and I am using dsymutil from Xcode 6.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-30 16:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-04-30 20:53 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-01 9:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (13 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-04-30 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #29 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
One more, at :45:
Matt Breedlove 2015-04-30 20:45:32 UTC
I now have no doubt that this is not a coincidence.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485149-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Apr 30 21:00:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485149-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67284 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2015 21:00:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67172 invoked by uid 48); 30 Apr 2015 21:00:32 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65955] New: [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02701.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4523
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide955
Bug ID: 65955
Summary: [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
When bootstrapping r222257 with ada on arm, I run into this error during
stage2:
...
build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -Bbuild/./prev-gcc/ -Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/
-Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/ -Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/lib/ -isystem
install/arm-linux-gnueabihf/include -isystem
install/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys-include -c -g -O2 -gtoggle -gnatpg -gnata
-W -Wall -nostdinc -I- -I. -Iada/generated -Iada -Isrc/gcc/ada
-Isrc/gcc/ada/gcc-interface src/gcc/ada/sem_eval.adb -o ada/sem_eval.o
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 6.0.0 20150421 (experimental) (arm-linux-gnueabihf) GCC error: |
| RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at |
| rtl.h:1710 |
| Error detected around
/home/vries/gcc_versions/devel/src/gcc/ada/sem_eval.adb:2707:8|
| Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html. |
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug. |
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report. |
| Include the exact command that you entered. |
| Also include sources listed below. |
+==========================================================================+
...
The ICE happens in the movcond_addsi split:
...
#14 0x01073338 in gen_split_2620 (curr_insn=0xb541aa00, operands=0x24df368
<recog_data>) at /home/vries/gcc_versions/devel/src/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:9334
9334 if (REGNO (operands[2]) != REGNO (operands[0]))
...
because operands[2] is not a reg, and we're taking it's regno:
...
(gdb) call debug_rtx (operands[2])
(const_int 0 [0])
...
Aforementioned split (and define_insn) as a whole:
...
9306 (define_insn_and_split "movcond_addsi"
9307 [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r,l,r")
9308 (if_then_else:SI
9309 (match_operator 5 "comparison_operator"
9310 [(plus:SI (match_operand:SI 3 "s_register_operand" "r,r,r")
9311 (match_operand:SI 4 "arm_add_operand"
"rIL,rIL,rIL"))
9312 (const_int 0)])
9313 (match_operand:SI 1 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI,rPy,r")
9314 (match_operand:SI 2 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI,rPy,r")))
9315 (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
9316 "TARGET_32BIT"
9317 "#"
9318 "&& reload_completed"
9319 [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CC_REGNUM)
9320 (compare:CC_NOOV
9321 (plus:SI (match_dup 3)
9322 (match_dup 4))
9323 (const_int 0)))
9324 (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
9325 (cond_exec (match_dup 6)
9326 (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 2)))]
9327 "
9328 {
9329 machine_mode mode = SELECT_CC_MODE (GET_CODE (operands[5]),
9330 operands[3], operands[4]);
9331 enum rtx_code rc = GET_CODE (operands[5]);
9332 operands[6] = gen_rtx_REG (mode, CC_REGNUM);
9333 gcc_assert (!(mode == CCFPmode || mode == CCFPEmode));
9334 if (REGNO (operands[2]) != REGNO (operands[0]))
9335 rc = reverse_condition (rc);
9336 else
9337 std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);
9338
9339 operands[6] = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (rc, VOIDmode, operands[6],
const0_rtx);
9340 }
9341 "
9342 [(set_attr "conds" "clob")
9343 (set_attr "enabled_for_depr_it" "no,yes,yes")
9344 (set_attr "type" "multiple")]
9345 )
...
The insn we're trying to split is:
...
(insn 409 64 79 4 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 3 r3 [orig:112 D.15185 ] [112])
(if_then_else:SI (ge (plus:SI (reg:SI 6 r6 [orig:141 D.15193 ]
[141])
(const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff]))
(const_int 0 [0]))
(reg:SI 6 r6 [orig:141 D.15193 ] [141])
(const_int 0 [0])))
(clobber (reg:CC 100 cc))
]) src/gcc/ada/sem_eval.adb:2658 258 {movcond_addsi}
(nil))
...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-30 20:53 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-05-01 9:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-03 1:00 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (12 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-05-01 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #30 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(I added some debug code to Bugzilla to try to understand what's wrong. Just
ignore this email.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 01 09:24:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70535 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 09:24:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70380 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2015 09:24:32 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 09:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-FMkmP0JdRj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2
Content-length: 163
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #31 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(ignore this one as well)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485174-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 01 09:36:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485174-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85051 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 09:36:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85019 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2015 09:36:15 -0000
From: "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65951] [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 09:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65951-4-KG1npIBMby@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2
Content-length: 361
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide951
--- Comment #3 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes you are right, we have no V2DI multiply. We do have V2DI shifts + add,
however, which would work well for some constants, e.g. the multiply by 16 in
PR/65952; perhaps the vectorizer does not consider such possibilities (whereas
we do for scalar code).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-01 9:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-05-03 1:00 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-08 6:22 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-05-03 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #32 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
For some reason, DateTime::TimeZone->new(name => 'local') sometimes returns
Asia/Kolkata, which explains the -05:30 offset observed in the famous 2% of
bugmails with an incorrect timestamp. I added extra debug code to track which
TZ method is the culprit.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485271-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun May 03 01:23:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485271-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92092 invoked by alias); 3 May 2015 01:23:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92021 invoked by uid 48); 3 May 2015 01:23:49 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 01:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-pC7S9qsi5Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2
Content-length: 268
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #33 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
I found only one user account which uses the Asia/Kolkata timezone. But no
reason why this would interact with the local timezone.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485272-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun May 03 01:42:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485272-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114895 invoked by alias); 3 May 2015 01:42:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114866 invoked by uid 48); 3 May 2015 01:42:30 -0000
From: "jcea at jcea dot es" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/65988] New: Trying to compile GCC 5.1 in my (customized) Solaris 10/x86-64 fails with GMP errors
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 01:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jcea at jcea dot es
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-65988-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2
Content-length: 6567
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
Bug ID: 65988
Summary: Trying to compile GCC 5.1 in my (customized) Solaris
10/x86-64 fails with GMP errors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jcea at jcea dot es
Target Milestone: ---
Currently running GCC 4.9.2. Compiled cleanly.
When trying to compile GCC 5.1 I get these errors: (partial/incomplete)
"""
[...]
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:69:3:
error: template with C linkage
template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits = char_traits<_CharT>,
^
In file included from
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/iosfwd:40:0,
from /usr/local/include/gmp.h:34,
from /usr/local/include/isl/val_gmp.h:4,
from ../../gcc-5.1.0/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:33:
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/postypes.h:111:3:
error: template with C linkage
template<typename _StateT>
^
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/postypes.h:214:3:
error: template with C linkage
template<typename _StateT>
^
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/postypes.h:219:3:
error: template with C linkage
template<typename _StateT>
^
In file included from /usr/local/include/gmp.h:34:0,
from /usr/local/include/isl/val_gmp.h:4,
from ../../gcc-5.1.0/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:33:
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/iosfwd:76:3: error:
template with C linkage
template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits = char_traits<_CharT> >
^
/tmp/z/obj/prev-i386-pc-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/include/iosfwd:79:3: error:
template with C linkage
[...]
In file included from /usr/local/include/isl/val_gmp.h:4:0,
from ../../gcc-5.1.0/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:33:
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2255:71: error: conflicting declaration of C function
‘std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, mpq_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpq_srcptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2254:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream&, mpz_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpz_srcptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2256:71: error: conflicting declaration of C function
‘std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, mpf_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpf_srcptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2255:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream&, mpq_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpq_srcptr);
[...]
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2255:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream&, mpq_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpq_srcptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2256:71: error: conflicting declaration of C function
‘std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, mpf_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpf_srcptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2254:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream&, mpz_srcptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &, mpz_srcptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2258:68: error: conflicting declaration of C function
‘std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, mpq_ptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &, mpq_ptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2257:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::istream&
operator>>(std::istream&, mpz_ptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &, mpz_ptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2259:68: error: conflicting declaration of C function
‘std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, mpf_ptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &, mpf_ptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2258:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::istream&
operator>>(std::istream&, mpq_ptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &, mpq_ptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2259:68: error: conflicting declaration of C function
‘std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, mpf_ptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &, mpf_ptr);
^
/usr/local/include/gmp.h:2257:33: note: previous declaration ‘std::istream&
operator>>(std::istream&, mpz_ptr)’
__GMP_DECLSPEC_XX std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &, mpz_ptr);
^
Makefile:1058: recipe for target 'graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.o' failed
make[3]: *** [graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/z/obj/gcc'
Makefile:4406: recipe for target 'all-stage2-gcc' failed
make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/z/obj'
Makefile:21875: recipe for target 'stage2-bubble' failed
make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/z/obj'
Makefile:899: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
"""
I am trying to compile with these options:
../gcc-5.1.0/configure --with-gnu-as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
--enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go
My system is Solaris 10 x86-64 bits.
I am trying to compile this with GCC 4.9.2, compiled on this very same machine
and working correctly for other source code I compile.
The GMP versions apparently conflicting are 6.0.0a and 5.1.2. I was running
5.1.2 and upgraded to 6.0.0a when I got this error, with the same result.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485273-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun May 03 02:51:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485273-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71285 invoked by alias); 3 May 2015 02:51:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71232 invoked by uid 48); 3 May 2015 02:51:17 -0000
From: "chenrylee at qq dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/63509] Misleading error message when building gcc without C++ compiler installed
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 02:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chenrylee at qq dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-63509-4-2UYrBxDaEw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2
Content-length: 416
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc509
Chenry <chenrylee at qq dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |chenrylee at qq dot com
--- Comment #4 from Chenry <chenrylee at qq dot com> ---
Also occurred on CentOS 7, solved by installing gcc-c++.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-03 1:00 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-05-08 6:22 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-08 6:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-08 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #35 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
CCing people doesn't work anymore.
For example on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066
when I click edit in the CC List, and add "mpolacek" and then hit
save changes immediately. On the next page it shows:
CC: mpolacek matched Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>
Then I hit enter. And the name is not entered in CC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-08 6:22 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-08 6:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-05-08 6:51 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2015-05-08 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #36 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the
whole email, or wait for the completion to appear and select it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-08 6:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2015-05-08 6:51 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-08 11:02 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-08 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #37 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #36)
> mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the
> whole email, or wait for the completion to appear and select it.
Yes when I wait for the completion to appear it works.
But in the previous version of bugzilla I could type mpolacek and hit
"Save Changes" immediately (before the autocompletion kicked in).
Then on the next page it would show the list of hits.
Select the one you want (in the case of mpolacek there is only one hit)
and hit "Continue". This doesn't work anymore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-08 6:51 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-08 11:02 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-08 18:55 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-05-08 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 3429 bytes --]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #38 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
I can confirm the regression. I reported this issue upstream:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162914
Thanks Markus for catching that! :)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485838-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 11:48:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485838-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61816 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 11:48:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61711 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2015 11:48:12 -0000
From: "steffen at hauihau dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66070] New: cc1 gets killed by OOM killer
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 11:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: steffen at hauihau dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-66070-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00678.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1306
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf070
Bug ID: 66070
Summary: cc1 gets killed by OOM killer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: steffen at hauihau dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 35496
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id5496&actioníit
preprocessed source
Compiling a 32 bit version libaacplus 2.0.2 failed after some time because the
lto1 process for one of the ltrans portions gets killed by the kernel OOM
killer. I've then disabled LTO for the build and detected, that the cc1 process
compiling fram_gen.c gets also killed by the OOM killer. I went on by lastly
disabling graphite and the file compiled fine independent of LTO enabled or
disabled.
Here is the cmdline which leads to the OOM invocation (LTO disabled):
gcc -m32 -march=native -O2 -pipe -ggdb -floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine
-floop-block -ftree-loop-distribution -fira-loop-pressure -ftree-vectorize
-ftree-loop-linear -flto=5 -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-lto -c fram_gen.i -fPIC
-DPIC -o /dev/null
Please let me know if and how I can help you further.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-08 11:02 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-05-08 18:55 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-08 19:04 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-05-08 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #39 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Bug fixed upstream, and here. :)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 18:58:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9591 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 18:58:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9549 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2015 18:58:47 -0000
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65894-4-0sFKies4tw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2
Content-length: 256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #31 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
Shall I do any checks now? It seems that Mikael's patch is doing the right
thing, and you found the one that breaks it again.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 19:00:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16680 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 19:00:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16072 invoked by uid 55); 8 May 2015 19:00:12 -0000
From: "mike.jost at hp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/66077] Right shift calculation error
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 19:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.7
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mike.jost at hp dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66077-4-IcDqwbzmcT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00721.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1469
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf077
--- Comment #2 from Mike Jost <mike.jost at hp dot com> ---
Thanks for the explanation! Bit by the 64 bit. That will teach me to use
uint32_t instead of assuming 32 for unsigned long. I've been running on 32 bit
embedded targets for too long!
Regards,
Michael Jost
mike.jost@hp.com
Software Engineer
Object Technology Solutions, Inc. (OTSI) contractor
HP Roseville - R3U Q8
(916) 785-2815
-----Original Message-----
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 11:40 AM
To: Jost, Mike (OTSI Contractor)
Subject: [Bug c/66077] Right shift calculation error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf077
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Your X and Y
are not correctly displaying.
The correct values are:
x = 0xF12B3740
y = 0x1F12B3740
You should be using %lX rather than %X to display unsigned long.
Like:
printf("x = 0x%lX\n", x);
printf("y = 0x%lX\n", y);
As you can see there is another bit set in the upper 32bits which causes the
difference.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-08 18:55 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-05-08 19:04 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-15 14:06 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-08 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #40 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for the quick fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-08 19:04 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-15 14:06 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-26 14:15 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-05-15 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #42 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #41)
> The GCC bugzilla favicon now shows generic Bugzilla favicon. Previously, it
> was a GCC favicon.
Fixed
>From gcc-bugs-return-486336-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 15 14:08:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-486336-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23017 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 14:07:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by uid 48); 15 May 2015 14:07:56 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-64968-4-H2neOCXq5i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01176.txt.bz2
Content-length: 578
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #35409|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #43 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Created attachment 35548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35548&action=edit
GCC patch for 5.0, v4
With GCC favicon.
>From gcc-bugs-return-486337-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 15 14:19:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-486337-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44301 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 14:19:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44230 invoked by uid 48); 15 May 2015 14:19:28 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/66157] bits/random.tcc compiler error when using -fno-for-scope
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-66157-4-WMbXHgYNxP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66157-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66157-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01177.txt.bz2
Content-length: 379
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf157
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |minor
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Don't do that then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-15 14:06 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2015-05-26 14:15 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 17:41 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-26 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #44 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Any update on the timestamp issue? It still happens regularly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-26 14:15 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-26 17:41 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-07-13 10:49 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2015-05-26 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #46 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
> I can add a workaround in Bugzilla itself, if that helps. Frank?
Please go ahead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-26 17:41 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2015-07-13 10:49 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-25 9:05 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-26 15:28 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-07-13 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #47 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another cosmetic issue that I've noticed is that an extra newline is added
after every quoted comment.
For example:
> test
reply
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-13 10:49 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-09-25 9:05 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-26 15:28 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-25 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #48 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #47)
> Another cosmetic issue that I've noticed is that an extra newline is added
> after every quoted comment.
>
> For example:
>
> > test
> reply
The extra line is fine if there is no extra line already.
> test1
reply (extra line introduced by bugzilla)
> test2
reply2 (two extra lines, one introduced by bugzilla, one by the author.)
Another issue. Searching all issues for "-fno-ipa-icf" returns "Zarro Boogs
found.". But of course there are plenty of PRs that include this string, e.g.:
PR67659.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=%22-fno-ipa-icf%22&list_id=126886&order=Importance&query_format=specific
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2015-09-25 9:05 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-09-26 15:28 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
32 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2015-09-26 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 11326 bytes --]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #49 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #47)
> Another cosmetic issue that I've noticed is that an extra newline is added
> after every quoted comment.
This problem has been reported upstream, see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208732
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #48)
> Another issue. Searching all issues for "-fno-ipa-icf" returns "Zarro Boogs
> found.".
The Simple Search page uses the MySQL fulltext search feature. Words much match
some criteria to be found and returned, see
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/fulltext-boolean.html. If you want to
avoid these limitations, use one of the following two solutions:
1) Use the Advanced Search page:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/query.cgi?longdesc=-fno-ipa-icf&longdesc_type=substring&query_format=advanced&resolution=DUPLICATE
2) Type: DUPL comment:"-fno-ipa-icf" in the QuickSearch box at the top/bottom
of pages.
Note that I added DUPL (duplicate bugs only) in the query to limit the number
of bugs returned. Without it, it seems that MySQL is too slow to return data
before Apache times out.
>From gcc-bugs-return-498092-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Sep 26 16:16:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-498092-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101357 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2015 16:16:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101336 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2015 16:16:38 -0000
From: "aiju at phicode dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67724] New: internal compiler error in stl_vector.h
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aiju at phicode dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-67724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg02070.txt.bz2
Content-length: 6272
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67724
Bug ID: 67724
Summary: internal compiler error in stl_vector.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: aiju at phicode dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Compilation of the attached file with cygwin's gcc-4.9.3 build fails with an
internal compilation error.
To reproduce run
$ gcc -c -Wall -Wextra -ggdb -MD -D_YOSYS_ -fPIC -std=gnu++0x -Os
-DYOSYS_ENABLE_READLINE -DYOSYS_ENABLE_PLUGINS -DYOSYS_ENABLE_TCL
-DYOSYS_ENABLE_ABC -DYOSYS_ENABLE_COVER yosys.ii
Original command line and output
$ gcc -o kernel/yosys.o -c -Wall -Wextra -ggdb -I. -I"./" -MD -D_YOSYS_ -fPIC
-I/usr/local/include -std=gnu++0x -Os -DYOSYS_ENABLE_READLINE
-DYOSYS_ENABLE_PLUGINS -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -DYOSYS_ENABLE_TCL
-DYOSYS_ENABLE_ABC -DYOSYS_ENABLE_COVER -v -save-temps kernel/yosys.cc
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
Target: x86_64-pc-cygwin
Configured with:
/cygdrive/i/szsz/tmpp/gcc/gcc-4.9.3-1.x86_64/src/gcc-4.9.3/configure
--srcdir=/cygdrive/i/szsz/tmpp/gcc/gcc-4.9.3-1.x86_64/src/gcc-4.9.3
--prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/gcc --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/gcc/html -C
--build=x86_64-pc-cygwin --host=x86_64-pc-cygwin --target=x86_64-pc-cygwin
--without-libiconv-prefix --without-libintl-prefix --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--enable-shared --enable-shared-libgcc --enable-static
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-bootstrap --enable-__cxa_atexit
--with-dwarf2 --with-tune=generic
--enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-graphite
--enable-threads=posix --enable-libatomic --enable-libgomp --disable-libitm
--enable-libquadmath --enable-libquadmath-support --enable-libssp
--enable-libada --enable-libgcj-sublibs --disable-java-awt --disable-symvers
--with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/ecj.jar --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
--with-cloog-include=/usr/include/cloog-isl --without-libiconv-prefix
--without-libintl-prefix --with-system-zlib --enable-linker-build-id
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.3 (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-o' 'kernel/yosys.o' '-c' '-Wall' '-Wextra' '-ggdb' '-I'
'.' '-I' './' '-MD' '-D' '_YOSYS_' '-fPIC' '-I' '/usr/local/include'
'-std=gnu++11' '-Os' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_READLINE' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_PLUGINS'
'-I' '/usr/include/tcl8.5' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_TCL' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_ABC' '-D'
'YOSYS_ENABLE_COVER' '-v' '-save-temps' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/cc1plus.exe -E -quiet -v -I . -I ./ -I
/usr/local/include -I /usr/include/tcl8.5 -MD kernel/yosys.d -MQ kernel/yosys.o
-Dunix -idirafter
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../lib/../include/w32api
-idirafter
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/lib/../lib/../../include/w32api
-D _YOSYS_ -D YOSYS_ENABLE_READLINE -D YOSYS_ENABLE_PLUGINS -D YOSYS_ENABLE_TCL
-D YOSYS_ENABLE_ABC -D YOSYS_ENABLE_COVER kernel/yosys.cc -mtune=generic
-march=x86-64 -std=gnu++11 -Wall -Wextra -fPIC -ggdb -fworking-directory -Os
-fpch-preprocess -o yosys.ii
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/lib/../lib/../../include/w32api"
ignoring duplicate directory "./"
ignoring duplicate directory "/usr/local/include"
as it is a non-system directory that duplicates a system directory
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
.
/usr/include/tcl8.5
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++/x86_64-pc-cygwin
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++/backward
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include
/usr/local/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include-fixed
/usr/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../lib/../include/w32api
End of search list.
kernel/yosys.cc:1:0: warning: -fPIC ignored for target (all code is position
independent)
/*
^
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-o' 'kernel/yosys.o' '-c' '-Wall' '-Wextra' '-ggdb' '-I'
'.' '-I' './' '-MD' '-D' '_YOSYS_' '-fPIC' '-I' '/usr/local/include'
'-std=gnu++11' '-Os' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_READLINE' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_PLUGINS'
'-I' '/usr/include/tcl8.5' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_TCL' '-D' 'YOSYS_ENABLE_ABC' '-D'
'YOSYS_ENABLE_COVER' '-v' '-save-temps' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/cc1plus.exe -fpreprocessed yosys.ii -quiet
-dumpbase yosys.cc -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip kernel/yosys.o
-ggdb -Os -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu++11 -version -fPIC -o yosys.s
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.9.3 (x86_64-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.9.3, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version
3.1.2-p11, MPC version 1.0.3
warning: MPFR header version 3.1.2-p11 differs from library version 3.1.3.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
kernel/yosys.cc:1:0: warning: -fPIC ignored for target (all code is position
independent)
/*
^
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.9.3 (x86_64-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.9.3, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version
3.1.2-p11, MPC version 1.0.3
warning: MPFR header version 3.1.2-p11 differs from library version 3.1.3.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: a7b6fac296390f5db29d753ab65194e7
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++/vector:64:0,
from ./kernel/yosys.h:44,
from kernel/yosys.cc:20:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h: In member
function ‘void Yosys::CellTypes::setup_internals()’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h:379:7:
internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7672
}
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-498093-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Sep 26 16:22:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-498093-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104571 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2015 16:22:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104527 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2015 16:22:20 -0000
From: "aiju at phicode dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67724] internal compiler error in stl_vector.h
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aiju at phicode dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-67724-4-lJqbg8bspw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg02071.txt.bz2
Content-length: 222
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg724
--- Comment #1 from Julius Schmidt <aiju at phicode dot de> ---
Created attachment 36398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id6398&actioníit
Testcase
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-26 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-07 14:23 [Bug web/64968] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-07 14:44 ` [Bug web/64968] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-09 10:39 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-09 11:43 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-02-11 14:37 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-11 16:33 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-02-11 20:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-02-11 20:48 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-18 18:30 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-27 15:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 17:39 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-04-27 18:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-27 19:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-28 16:28 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28 18:26 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-29 12:27 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-29 16:02 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 13:48 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 16:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-04-30 20:53 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-01 9:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-03 1:00 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-08 6:22 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-08 6:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-05-08 6:51 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-08 11:02 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-08 18:55 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-08 19:04 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-15 14:06 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2015-05-26 14:15 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 17:41 ` fche at redhat dot com
2015-07-13 10:49 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-25 9:05 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-26 15:28 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).