From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6169 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:48:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5837 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:48:39 -0000 From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01259.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64968 --- Comment #7 from Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Buclin = --- Created attachment 34736 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D34736&action=3Dedit GCC extension for 5.0, v1 This is exactly the same GCC extension as for 4.4.5. So far, it seems to wo= rk fine (on my local test installation). >>From gcc-bugs-return-476927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 11 20:51:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12108 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 20:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12033 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2015 20:51:46 -0000 From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/65028] [5 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01260.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1427 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028 Jan Hubicka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjambor at suse dot cz --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, the code dies realtively soon: Breakpoint 1, main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffec28) at example.cc:116 116 { (gdb) n 169 NameSet rownames; (gdb) 170 NameSet colnames; (gdb) 186 for(optidx = 1; optidx < argc; optidx++) (gdb) 188 if (*argv[optidx] != '-') (gdb) 254 if ((argc - optidx) < 1) (gdb) 267 MySoPlex work(type, representation); (gdb) 262 Param::setEpsilon(epsilon); (gdb) 263 Param::setVerbose(verbose); (gdb) 265 std::cout.setf(std::ios::scientific | std::ios::showpoint); (gdb) 267 MySoPlex work(type, representation); (gdb) 262 Param::setEpsilon(epsilon); (gdb) 267 MySoPlex work(type, representation); (gdb) 213 timelimit = atof(&argv[optidx][2]); Clearly I do not pass any option, so there is no need for code getting there at all. -fno-ipa-cp fixes the bug, so I suspect it is a bug in ipa-cp WRT redirection to local functions with clonnes... Martin, perhaps you can spot it faster? Honza