[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

["LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968

--- Comment #39 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Bug fixed upstream, and here. :)
>From gcc-bugs-return-485880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 18:58:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9591 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 18:58:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9549 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2015 18:58:47 -0000
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65894-4-0sFKies4tw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2
Content-length: 256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894

--- Comment #31 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
Shall I do any checks now? It seems that Mikael's patch is doing the right
thing, and you found the one that breaks it again.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 19:00:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16680 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 19:00:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16072 invoked by uid 55); 8 May 2015 19:00:12 -0000
From: "mike.jost at hp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/66077] Right shift calculation error
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 19:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.7
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mike.jost at hp dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66077-4-IcDqwbzmcT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00721.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf077

--- Comment #2 from Mike Jost <mike.jost at hp dot com> ---
Thanks for the explanation! Bit by the 64 bit. That will teach me to use
uint32_t instead of assuming 32 for unsigned long. I've been running on 32 bit
embedded targets for too long!


Regards,
Michael Jost
mike.jost@hp.com
Software Engineer
Object Technology Solutions, Inc. (OTSI) contractor
HP Roseville - R3U Q8
(916) 785-2815



-----Original Message-----
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 11:40 AM
To: Jost, Mike (OTSI Contractor)
Subject: [Bug c/66077] Right shift calculation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf077

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Your X and Y
are not correctly displaying.

The correct values are:
x = 0xF12B3740
y = 0x1F12B3740


You should be using %lX rather than %X to display unsigned long.

Like:
   printf("x = 0x%lX\n", x);
   printf("y = 0x%lX\n", y);

As you can see there is another bit set in the upper 32bits which causes the
difference.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.