From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96173 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 18:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96136 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2015 18:55:19 -0000 From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0 Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00719.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64968 --- Comment #39 from Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Buclin --- Bug fixed upstream, and here. :) >>From gcc-bugs-return-485880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 18:58:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9591 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 18:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9549 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2015 18:58:47 -0000 From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0 Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 Content-length: 256 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65894 --- Comment #31 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter --- Shall I do any checks now? It seems that Mikael's patch is doing the right thing, and you found the one that breaks it again. >>From gcc-bugs-return-485881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 19:00:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16680 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 19:00:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16072 invoked by uid 55); 8 May 2015 19:00:12 -0000 From: "mike.jost at hp dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/66077] Right shift calculation error Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 19:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.7 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mike.jost at hp dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00721.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1469 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66077 --- Comment #2 from Mike Jost --- Thanks for the explanation! Bit by the 64 bit. That will teach me to use uint32_t instead of assuming 32 for unsigned long. I've been running on 32 bit embedded targets for too long! Regards, Michael Jost mike.jost@hp.com Software Engineer Object Technology Solutions, Inc. (OTSI) contractor HP Roseville - R3U Q8 (916) 785-2815 -----Original Message----- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 11:40 AM To: Jost, Mike (OTSI Contractor) Subject: [Bug c/66077] Right shift calculation error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66077 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Your X and Y are not correctly displaying. The correct values are: x = 0xF12B3740 y = 0x1F12B3740 You should be using %lX rather than %X to display unsigned long. Like: printf("x = 0x%lX\n", x); printf("y = 0x%lX\n", y); As you can see there is another bit set in the upper 32bits which causes the difference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.