From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22370 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2015 20:21:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22066 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2015 20:21:19 -0000 From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/64983] Incomplete summary when regtesting with dejagnu 1.5.2. Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg02054.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64983 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to howarth from comment #4) > FYI, I posted this to > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-dejagnu/2015-02/msg00001.html and > emailed Ben Elliston the g++.log files generated under dejagnu 1.5.1 and > 1.5.2. well, as I indicated above, I suspect the interesting files are the *.{sum,log}.sep (and only one set for one language should be enough to figu= re out the problem). However, the content isn't stable=E2=80=A6 (my analysis = stopped at that point, and haven't had time to resume). IIRC, parallel make-check-objc is the shortest test-suite that shows the is= sue. >>From gcc-bugs-return-477722-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 18 20:22:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24634 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2015 20:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24566 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2015 20:22:06 -0000 From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg02055.txt.bz2 Content-length: 633 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #22) > count_rate(8),count_max(1) = 0 127 > > OK, but the last line looks strange: lacking documentation, > I'd expect the rate to be 1, not 0. (Not that I'd use that > in real code...). Yes, tha last one is wrong. I will look into it. I realize that by adding an additional argument we modify the interface so we may have to do something with symbol versioning. Doing it the way I did eliminates multiple calls but there are always trade-offs