public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug sanitizer/64996] New: UBsan check optimized out by -O
@ 2015-02-10 9:25 sami.liedes at iki dot fi
2015-02-10 9:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/64996] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 9:10 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sami.liedes at iki dot fi @ 2015-02-10 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64996
Bug ID: 64996
Summary: UBsan check optimized out by -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sami.liedes at iki dot fi
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Consider this program:
#include "limits.h"
int main() {
int i=INT_MIN;
i--;
}
When compiled with -fsanitize=undefined -O0, ub is correctly detected:
$ gcc -fsanitize=undefined ub.c -o ub && ./ub
ub.c:4:10: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -2147483648 + -1 cannot be
represented in type 'int'
When compiled with -O, the entire check is optimized out, even if the program
still clearly exhibits ub:
$ gcc -fsanitize=undefined ub.c -o ub -O && ./ub
$ gcc -fsanitize=undefined ub.c -o ub.s -O -S
$ cat ub.s
.file "ub.c"
.text
.globl main
.type main, @function
main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
rep ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size main, .-main
.ident "GCC: (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
$
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64996] UBsan check optimized out by -O
2015-02-10 9:25 [Bug sanitizer/64996] New: UBsan check optimized out by -O sami.liedes at iki dot fi
@ 2015-02-10 9:50 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 9:10 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64996
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Since the variable is unused, we get rid of it, and then DCE removes the ubsan
check. I don't think it is a bug. Adding asm ("" : "+g" (i)); after the
decrement makes the runtime error appear again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64996] UBsan check optimized out by -O
2015-02-10 9:25 [Bug sanitizer/64996] New: UBsan check optimized out by -O sami.liedes at iki dot fi
2015-02-10 9:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/64996] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-10 9:10 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2015-03-10 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64996
Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #2 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> ---
Also take a look at second FAQ question at
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer#FAQ (it's for
ASan but same logic applies).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-10 9:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-10 9:25 [Bug sanitizer/64996] New: UBsan check optimized out by -O sami.liedes at iki dot fi
2015-02-10 9:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/64996] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 9:10 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).