public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug go/64999] s390x libgo test failure in TestMemoryProfiler Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:17:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-64999-4-pdbZESwD7m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-64999-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999 --- Comment #27 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> --- The runtime.Callers function (and friends) are somewhat broken for gccgo no matter what we do. The problem is that we can't represent full file/line information using a single PC value, because a single PC value can't represent inlined functions. Fortunately, the case where libbacktrace does not decrement the PC is not very interesting for Go, because we aren't going to get any useful file/line information for that case anyhow. It's the case of unwinding through a signal handler: the PC value in the signal handler does not follow a call instruction, and therefore should not be decremented. But there is no useful file/line information in a signal handler anyhow. I'm still not fully certain as to what the best fix is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 22:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-02-10 12:13 [Bug go/64999] New: " vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-10 15:21 ` [Bug go/64999] " vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-10 15:23 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-10 15:25 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-10 15:36 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-10 15:55 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-10 17:20 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-11 7:15 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-11 7:38 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-11 17:45 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-12 7:02 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-12 16:45 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-12 17:24 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-16 10:59 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-16 11:49 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-16 11:50 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-16 14:08 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-17 11:13 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-17 12:07 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-17 14:24 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-18 9:21 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-18 12:28 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-18 13:13 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-18 18:52 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-24 14:07 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-02-24 18:51 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-24 22:25 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-02-25 0:17 ` ian at airs dot com [this message] 2015-02-25 0:55 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-02-26 9:55 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2015-02-26 16:25 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-02-26 16:56 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-26 17:08 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-02-26 17:13 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-02-26 18:25 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-06 17:24 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-06 20:08 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-06 21:08 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-09 20:56 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-09 22:02 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-10 12:28 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-10 14:21 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-10 14:44 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-10 16:17 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-10 17:49 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-10 18:28 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-10 20:18 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-10 20:45 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-03-12 14:13 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-03-12 15:30 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-04-17 12:47 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-04-17 13:04 ` boger at us dot ibm.com 2015-04-17 19:30 ` ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-17 19:30 ` ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-17 21:32 ` ian at airs dot com 2015-04-21 8:28 ` vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-64999-4-pdbZESwD7m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).