From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476750-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25986 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2015 20:47:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25946 invoked by uid 48); 10 Feb 2015 20:47:12 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65006] [5 Regression] 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompiled
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65006-4-htw9XNI34D@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01083.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65006

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> Hmm, I wonder why this reproduce on x86-32 only. Does it use any special
> local calling conventions that x86-64 doesn't?

For local functions, GCC will use regparm to pass parameters in registers,
instead of on stack.