From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31727 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2015 11:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31664 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2015 11:40:34 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/65042] gcc5 has a template depth problem that was fine in gcc4 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01472.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65042 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Trying to use the standard library with such a tiny limit is simply not going to work. If it worked previously you got lucky, but if you need to raise the limit now then that's what you need to do. What's the purpose of enforcing such a tiny limit anyway?