public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/65051] New: [5 Regression] r210436 regression?
@ 2015-02-13 14:48 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-02-13 14:49 ` [Bug c++/65051] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-13 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65051

            Bug ID: 65051
           Summary: [5 Regression] r210436 regression?
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

template<typename T> struct wrap { typedef T type; };
template <class T> class rv: public wrap <T>::type {};

template <class value_type>
struct circular_buffer
{
    typedef const value_type& param_value_type;
    typedef rv< value_type >& rvalue_type;

    void push_back(param_value_type item) {}
    void push_back(rvalue_type item) {}
};

union U { int i; char c; };

void f(circular_buffer<U> b, const U& u) { b.push_back(u); }

used to be accepted until r210435, since r210436 it is rejected.  Jon said that
this is accepted by clang and EDG.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-13 16:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-13 14:48 [Bug c++/65051] New: [5 Regression] r210436 regression? jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-13 14:49 ` [Bug c++/65051] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-13 15:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-13 16:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-13 16:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).