From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69571 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2015 20:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69490 invoked by uid 48); 25 Mar 2015 20:20:31 -0000 From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg02858.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 Jan Hubicka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka --- Thanks, Richard. I will take a look for the bootstrap ICE. Running one extra local pure-const should be cheap enough and dropping large regions of EH code seems like a win. Concering the inline decision difference, perhaps you can have more insight. I typically use tramp3d as a black box to test heuristic changes - it is almost impossible for me to figure out why inlining decisions went wrong on this beast ;)) Why exactly does chkp pass can not run as part of early opts?