From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14224 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2015 13:22:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13992 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2015 13:22:08 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01736.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > So it's either time spent in the inliner (unlikely, though the patch has an > extra update_callee_keys call) or different (early) inlining decisions. > > I remember you saying that without LTO/PGO-ing GCC the difference is a lot > smaller? No, with --disable-bootstrap it still goes from 27.133 (r219451) to 31.116 (r219452).